Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the didn't-see-it-coming dept.

Only two years after its launch, one of Russia's early warning satellites has been officially declared non-operational. With the loss of Cosmos-2479 Russia no longer has any early warning satellites in geo-synchronoous orbit. The two remaining early warning satellites are in HEO, and provide much more limited coverage.

Russia does have two older types of missile detection satellites in highly elliptical orbits, meaning that location relative to the Earth often changes. In order to provide constant coverage with these types of satellites, Russia would need to maintain six of them in space at any given moment. As a result, Moscow can now only monitor U.S. missile launches for three hours a day.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:26AM (#60241)

    ...early-warning satellite loses you!

    so does this mean russia now only has 9,999 satellites instead of 10,000

    they'll have to launch another 10 (at a lower cost than 1 us satellite) to save face

    • (Score: 2) by SlimmPickens on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:30AM

      by SlimmPickens (1056) on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:30AM (#60242)

      what will they pay with? vodka?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:38AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @07:38AM (#60243)

        rubles will buy far more rocket in russia than dollars could ever buy in america

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:05AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:05AM (#60250)

          Happy space flight Laika, was nice knowing you...

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:20AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:20AM (#60252) Journal
    It's not lost ... just mixed together with the other 100-minus-x marbles in a bucket [soylentnews.org] - too bad the verifier won't ever find out what x was.
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 1) by q.kontinuum on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:48AM

      by q.kontinuum (532) on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:48AM (#60258) Journal

      But I think this confirms that someone lost his marbles...

      --
      Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:50AM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 26 2014, @08:50AM (#60259) Journal
        But... neither the marbles are lost... you see? They are mixed with the satellite.
        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Thursday June 26 2014, @06:04PM

      by davester666 (155) on Thursday June 26 2014, @06:04PM (#60450)

      I wonder if the satellite gave them an early warning that it was going to fail?

  • (Score: 1) by karmawhore on Thursday June 26 2014, @02:44PM

    by karmawhore (1635) on Thursday June 26 2014, @02:44PM (#60346)

    If Capt Janeway were president, she would let them use some of ours.

    Problem solved!

    --
    =kw= lurkin' to please
    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Thursday June 26 2014, @04:18PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Thursday June 26 2014, @04:18PM (#60387)

      We don't share our technology with the Kazon.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @02:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @02:51PM (#60352)

    Why would we believe this? Until an independent 3rd party verifies this for itself (US DoD?), I suggest we all assume this is hogwash and act accordingly.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @05:43PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26 2014, @05:43PM (#60441)

      That is the wrong question. 'Why would they announce this easily verifiable information?' is the right question. Every modern nation has the ability to check these things. Odds are that this is very old news to people that have a need to care about it. Announcing it is just a public effort to garner budgetary support. This has been a problem for awhile and they have not been able to fix it quietly, so now they are trying the loud approach.

      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Thursday June 26 2014, @09:20PM

        by frojack (1554) on Thursday June 26 2014, @09:20PM (#60575) Journal

        Budgetary support? In a command economy? (Yes, Russia still is very much a command economy).

        I agree that probably everyone knows this bird is dead. But there was no reason to announce anything at all, and that would have been the wise choice.

        So there is a motive here, we just don't know what it is.

        In other news, North Korea launched several short range missiles [usatoday.com] into the sea again the other day in their never ending war on the fish. Perhaps plausibility deniability is something the Russians feel a sudden need for.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 1) by Valkor on Thursday June 26 2014, @03:33PM

    by Valkor (4253) on Thursday June 26 2014, @03:33PM (#60370)

    It's cool, man, we won't nuke you. Really! I promise!