Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Woods on Wednesday July 09 2014, @03:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the new-buzz-words-to-the-rescue dept.

Fully automated "deep learning" by computers greatly improves the odds of discovering particles such as the Higgs boson, beating even veteran physicists' abilities, according to findings by UC Irvine researchers published today in the journal Nature Communications. "We are thrilled with the publication of our work," said co-author Pierre Baldi, Chancellor's Professor of computer science, "and even more so with the hope that deep learning may help solve fundamental open questions about the nature of matter, gravity and the origin of the universe."

Baldi, along with computer science Ph.D. student Peter Sadowski and associate professor of physics & astronomy Daniel Whiteson, found quicker, more efficient ways to analyze data obtained from particle accelerators/colliders to better detect rare particles. The Higgs boson first theorized in 1964 and whose existence was finally confirmed in 2012 at the massive, underground Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland could help explain why some particles have mass, among other primary questions of physics. Finding these particles requires sorting out relevant data from huge amounts of background noise; machine learning techniques are already used in analyzing these sets of "big data."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by AnonTechie on Wednesday July 09 2014, @10:01PM

    by AnonTechie (2275) on Wednesday July 09 2014, @10:01PM (#66758) Journal

    Does nobody have any comment on this story ?

    --
    Albert Einstein - "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by hendrikboom on Thursday July 10 2014, @02:56AM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 10 2014, @02:56AM (#66860) Homepage Journal

    Could the deep learning produce search methods that end up biasing the selection process, yielding corrupt statistics?