Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by azrael on Friday August 08 2014, @01:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the self-inflicted-wounds dept.

A movie director has claimed that Hollywood directors abusing staff can lead to movie leaks:

The idea that The Expendables 3 leaked directly from Hollywood is not new. Pristine copies like these simply aren't available on the streets unless an insider has had a hand in it somehow, whether that interaction was intentional or otherwise.

In some instances the motivation to leak, Alexander suggests, could be borne out of a desire to get even. Assistants to the higher-ups are often treated badly, so more consideration should be given to what they might do in return, the director notes.

"It's kind of like going to a restaurant and thinking twice about insulting the waiter or busboy because you're afraid of what they'll put in the food before they bring it back", Alexander explains.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by jorl17 on Friday August 08 2014, @01:04AM

    by jorl17 (3747) on Friday August 08 2014, @01:04AM (#78672)

    How is this news? I think everybody has already realized this, and if they haven't, then they should have...

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Nollij on Friday August 08 2014, @01:32AM

      by Nollij (4559) on Friday August 08 2014, @01:32AM (#78675)

      While everyone knows insiders have been involved, this suggests a different motive. The usual narrative is that the filthy pirates have infiltrated the industry, and are plunderin' for their pirate friends. It also pins much of the blame on the Hollywood elite, rather than the leaker.

      That being said, I'm not convinced that said director [wikipedia.org] isn't just doing this for publicity, or perhaps because of her own grudge against the Hollywood elite.

      • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:41AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:41AM (#78681)

        That being said, I'm not convinced that said director isn't just doing this for publicity, or perhaps because of her own grudge against the Hollywood elite.

        More than one thing can be true at the same time.

        • (Score: -1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday August 08 2014, @10:34AM

          by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday August 08 2014, @10:34AM (#78785) Homepage

          Lexi Alexander was probably just getting back at the pedophilic Jewish elites who "auditioned" her as a director the same way that porn stars are "auditioned" on top of and under the desks of bulbous, balding hooknosed executives.

          Oy, Vey! Dis iz a Holocaust!

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:33AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:33AM (#78676)

      > I think everybody has already realized this

      Not the people most likely to be abusive. That kind of narcissism would be a direct impediment to figuring out such a cause and effect relationship. And if there is one thing that Hollywood has a surplus of, it is narcissism.

      • (Score: 1) by jorl17 on Friday August 08 2014, @02:21AM

        by jorl17 (3747) on Friday August 08 2014, @02:21AM (#78692)

        I see your point, and agree with it. However, I was talking about us, outsiders. Haven't we all pretty much figured it out? I never thought (maybe I was wrong) that "pirates had infiltrated"...

      • (Score: 2) by carguy on Friday August 08 2014, @04:37AM

        by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 08 2014, @04:37AM (#78716)

        Allen Toussaint - "On Your Way Down" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV-bFdf6yu8 [youtube.com]
        Covered by many, maybe best by Little Feat.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:33AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @01:33AM (#78677)

      they should have

      You're expecting sociopaths to care about other people?

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Nollij on Friday August 08 2014, @01:39AM

        by Nollij (4559) on Friday August 08 2014, @01:39AM (#78678)

        "Never appeal to a man's better nature. He may not have one. Invoking his self-interest gives you more leverage." -Robert A. Heinlein

      • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday August 08 2014, @02:05AM

        by kaszz (4211) on Friday August 08 2014, @02:05AM (#78688) Journal

        Like repealing freedom of expression and democracy to keep their cash cow at an all time high? Perhaps sharing "fines" resulting in suicides is a great good for the almighty profit.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Dale on Friday August 08 2014, @01:45AM

    by Dale (539) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 08 2014, @01:45AM (#78684)

    It seems reasonable that people aren't going to be hyper protective of the secrets of someone who treats them like dirt/scum/indifference/whatever. Who wants to bet that the powers that be try fear and spending more money on security rather than treating the workers better though?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @03:49PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 08 2014, @03:49PM (#78933)

    I don't know much about Hollywood and movies. But the concept seems similar to the software industry of the past. People on the inside provide copies of software (mostly games) in advance, in rare or few cases they are bought.

    • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Saturday August 09 2014, @06:40AM

      by davester666 (155) on Saturday August 09 2014, @06:40AM (#79244)

      You have this reversed. Hollywood came before the software industry.