Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday September 22 2014, @07:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the which-end-is-which? dept.

A New Hadrosaur has been described as having distinctive nasal profile (Full Text); a hook-shaped projection of the nasal anteroventral process and dorsal projection of the posteroventral process of the premaxilla, and is further differentiated from other hadrosaurid species based on the morphology of the nasal.

The new dinosaur, named Rhinorex condrupus by paleontologists from North Carolina State University and Brigham Young University, lived in what is now Utah approximately 75 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous period.

Rhinorex, which translates roughly into “King Nose,” was a plant-eater and a close relative of other Cretaceous hadrosaurs like Parasaurolophus and Edmontosaurus. Hadrosaurs are usually identified by bony crests that extended from the skull, although Edmontosaurus doesn’t have such a hard crest (paleontologists have discovered that it had a fleshy crest). Rhinorex also lacks a crest on the top of its head; instead, this new dinosaur has a huge nose.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by randmcnatt on Monday September 22 2014, @09:06PM

    by randmcnatt (671) on Monday September 22 2014, @09:06PM (#96932)
    The artist's rendering and one of the diagrams of the skull are over at Sci-News [sci-news.com], among other places.
    --
    The Wright brothers were not the first to fly: they were the first to land.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 22 2014, @09:57PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 22 2014, @09:57PM (#96944) Journal
    The contrast between "new dinosaur" and "75 millions years ago" create sort of a tension, isn't it?
    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by lhsi on Tuesday September 23 2014, @07:30AM

      by lhsi (711) on Tuesday September 23 2014, @07:30AM (#97061) Journal

      Yes, I think "Newly discovered" or "Newly defined" would have been more accurate here.

  • (Score: 2) by EvilJim on Monday September 22 2014, @11:09PM

    by EvilJim (2501) on Monday September 22 2014, @11:09PM (#96959) Journal

    Did it also hoard gold? or is that racist?