Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by azrael on Wednesday October 01 2014, @02:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the food-to-die-for dept.

ScienceMag is running a story that reveals some of the survival and propagation mechanisms of the Anthrax Bacillus in the wild. It turns out the bacterium has a green thumb.

In northwestern Namibia's Etosha National Park, the carcasses of animals that have died of anthrax fertilize patches of grass, making them particularly lush, and attractive to other animals. Of course animals that died from other causes fertilize grass too.

Wendy Turner, a disease and wildlife ecologist at the University of Oslo, noticed that the much greener grass near old Zebra carcasses seemed to attract animals, predominantly Zebras. Since Zebras seem particularly prone to death by Anthrax, she decided to study the effect of the pathogen on vegetation.

In a series of experiments, she added B. anthracis spores to the soil of native grass plantings and showed that the seeds were 50% more likely to germinate than controls. This work suggested a symbiotic relationship between savanna grasses and Anthrax transmission.

She headed back to Etosha, and staked out 26 sites where Zebra's had died. 13 of them died of Anthrax, and 13 died of other causes. She rigged each site with motion sensing cameras and waited. Meanwhile, sites were tested annually for the presence of anthrax on vegetation and in the soil.

Three years, and 1.2 million pictures later she had the answer.

Careful analysis showed animals were as likely to visit the anthrax-laden sites as the control sites. But they were four times more likely to graze at the anthrax sites, exposing themselves to the deadly pathogen. The strongest preference for munching on infected grass was observed in zebras, which also have the highest incidence of anthrax infection, followed by wildebeests and springboks.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by morgauxo on Wednesday October 01 2014, @04:04PM

    by morgauxo (2082) on Wednesday October 01 2014, @04:04PM (#100516)

    Wouldn't it be awesome to remove the genes which make Anthrax a pathogen while keeping the fertilization ability...

  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday October 01 2014, @08:32PM

    by frojack (1554) on Wednesday October 01 2014, @08:32PM (#100638) Journal

    After re-reading the story, it occurred to me that it might be possible to prevent the spread of Anthrax by dosing the area around an anthrax-killed carcass with enough weed killer to prevent anything from germinating for a year or two or three, long enough for the spores to die naturally, which might be several years [davidson.edu].

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday October 01 2014, @08:58PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday October 01 2014, @08:58PM (#100656)

    > Three years, and 1.2 million pictures later

    This is either exceptional dedication or a weird zebra fetish...

    • (Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday October 01 2014, @09:18PM

      by frojack (1554) on Wednesday October 01 2014, @09:18PM (#100661) Journal

      Or maybe just motion sensing cameras.

      These things are amazingly cheep [amazon.com].
      You bolt them to a tree or post and with a hand full of double A batteries they will capture images (and stop-action video) of anything
      that comes by.

      In TFA there is a link to an example of stop-action videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pewEOHjj10M&feature=youtu.be [youtube.com]

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday October 01 2014, @09:21PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday October 01 2014, @09:21PM (#100664)

        It's not the "how to take them" that's amazing, it's the time it probably took to manage that amount of data.
        I know that a zebra detection algorithm is pretty dang easy, but that's still a lot of sorting...

    • (Score: 1) by Horse With Stripes on Thursday October 02 2014, @01:37AM

      by Horse With Stripes (577) on Thursday October 02 2014, @01:37AM (#100779)

      This is either exceptional dedication or a weird zebra fetish...

      Is there such a thing as a weird zebra fetish? I think not. ;-)

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 02 2014, @12:56AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 02 2014, @12:56AM (#100775)

    for deleting my thumbs.up.gif title comment on a excellent article title.