Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by azrael on Tuesday October 21 2014, @10:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-ideas-get-new-people dept.

Isaac Asimov was one of the great sci-fi writers of the 20th century. So naturally, at the dawn of the space age, the military wanted to tap his brain. In 1959 he was approached by ARPA (now known as DARPA) to "think outside of the box" about how ideas are formed. His brief work for the organization has never before been published.

Asimov took a few meetings with ARPA and Allied Research Associates in Boston, but ultimately decided against long term involvement with the organizations. Asimov was apparently afraid that any access to classified military material would limit his freedom of expression. And rightly so, since it would have no doubt hampered his ability to publish fiction freely. However, Asimov did produce a single paper for the organization that has never been published until today.

Arthur Obermayer, a friend of the Isaac Asimov, writes that he recently rediscovered an unpublished essay by Asimov written in 1959 while cleaning out some old files that is "as broadly relevant today as when he wrote it. It describes not only the creative process and the nature of creative people but also the kind of environment that promotes creativity."

Some excerpts from Asimov's essay, which is well worth reading in its entirety:

Presumably, the process of creativity, whatever it is, is essentially the same in all its branches and varieties, so that the evolution of a new art form, a new gadget, a new scientific principle, all involve common factors. It is only afterward that a new idea seems reasonable. What is needed is not only people with a good background in a particular field, but also people capable of making a connection between item 1 and item 2 which might not ordinarily seem connected. To begin with, it usually seems unreasonable. It seems the height of unreason to suppose the earth was round instead of flat, or that it moved instead of the sun, or that objects required a force to stop them when in motion, instead of a force to keep them moving, and so on.

A person willing to fly in the face of reason, authority, and common sense must be a person of considerable self-assurance. Since he occurs only rarely, he must seem eccentric (in at least that respect) to the rest of us. A person eccentric in one respect is often eccentric in others. Probably more inhibiting than anything else is a feeling of responsibility. The great ideas of the ages have come from people who weren’t paid to have great ideas, but were paid to be teachers or patent clerks or petty officials, or were not paid at all. The great ideas came as side issues.

My feeling is that as far as creativity is concerned, isolation is required. The creative person is, in any case, continually working at it. His mind is shuffling his information at all times, even when he is not conscious of it. The presence of others can only inhibit this process, since creation is embarrassing. For every new good idea you have, there are a hundred, ten thousand foolish ones, which you naturally do not care to display.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by kaszz on Tuesday October 21 2014, @11:23PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday October 21 2014, @11:23PM (#108464) Journal

    Isaac Asimov's Newly Published 1959 Paper for DARPA on Creativity [gizmodo.com]:
      * Don't get involved with secret organizations.
      * Give people plenty of time to horse around.
      * Keep up appearances of important work while producing short reports to maximize free time.
      * Avoid responsibility.
      * Don't try to force ideas or feel guilty.

    Full assay at: Published for the First Time: a 1959 Essay by Isaac Asimov on Creativity [technologyreview.com]

      * Good background in a particular field.
      * Ability to make unusual connections.
      * Cross-connection requires a certain daring or it's just a corollary of an old idea.
      * Considerable self-assurance.
      * Eccentric.
      * Unconventional in habits but not a crackpot.
      * Thinking for oneself in isolation.
      * Ridicule free zone of "crazy" ideas.
      * Ease, relaxation, and a general sense of permissiveness in the working environment.
      * Avoid unsympathetic individual and allow people to suggest foolish ideas.
      * Participants with great reputation, more articulate or commanding personality may nullify the benefit of the rest.
      * Informality, joviality, the use of first names, joking, relaxed kidding.
      * Meetings should be slightly guided in a psychoanalytic manner.
      * Creative gadgets around.

    This can in turn be summarized as: Relaxed environment without interruptions. Good knowledge in the particular field. Ability to make unusual connections. Unconventional in habits but not a crackpot. Some guidance.

  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Tuesday October 21 2014, @11:43PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Tuesday October 21 2014, @11:43PM (#108471) Homepage Journal

    Even though I had to click again to get to all of my favorite author's words. [technologyreview.com]

    The article makes it look like it was Asimov's sci-fi that got ARPA's attention. That isn't what I gathered from the real article, two paragraphs by Asimov's friend who brought it to light before Asimov's words.

    Asimov wasn't just a science fiction writer, he was known as "the great educator" for his huge number of nonfiction science and math books.

    He was also, perhaps most importantly to ARPA, a scientist. He held a PhD in biochemistry and did cancer research at Boston University in the 1950s.

    I have only two things left on my bucket list. One is to visit Ireland, where my ancestors came from. The other is to read the 200 or so of Asimov's over 500 books I haven't read yet. The second is the least likely, as I have yet to find a comprehensive list.

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Wednesday October 22 2014, @12:14AM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Wednesday October 22 2014, @12:14AM (#108475) Homepage Journal

      Please forgive me for responding to myself, but I'm just getting into the real article that has the long treatise by Asimov himself, and I'm now really disappointed in the article from Gizmondao. THAT's all they got out of it??

      I think far more interesting to s/ners is

      ...But what if the same earth-shaking idea occurred to two men, simultaneously and independently? Perhaps, the common factors involved would be illuminating. Consider the theory of evolution by natural selection, independently created by Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace.

      There is a great deal in common there. Both traveled to far places, observing strange species of plants and animals and the manner in which they varied from place to place. Both were keenly interested in finding an explanation for this, and both failed until each happened to read Malthus’s “Essay on Population.”

      Both then saw how the notion of overpopulation and weeding out (which Malthus had applied to human beings) would fit into the doctrine of evolution by natural selection (if applied to species generally).

      Obviously, then, what is needed is not only people with a good background in a particular field, but also people capable of making a connection between item 1 and item 2 which might not ordinarily seem connected.

      Undoubtedly in the first half of the 19th century, a great many naturalists had studied the manner in which species were differentiated among themselves. A great many people had read Malthus. Perhaps some both studied species and read Malthus. But what you needed was someone who studied species, read Malthus, and had the ability to make a cross-connection.

      That is the crucial point that is the rare characteristic that must be found. Once the cross-connection is made, it becomes obvious. Thomas H. Huxley is supposed to have exclaimed after reading On the Origin of Species, “How stupid of me not to have thought of this.”

      But why didn’t he think of it? The history of human thought would make it seem that there is difficulty in thinking of an idea even when all the facts are on the table. Making the cross-connection requires a certain daring. It must, for any cross-connection that does not require daring is performed at once by many and develops not as a “new idea,” but as a mere “corollary of an old idea.”

      It is only afterward that a new idea seems reasonable. To begin with, it usually seems unreasonable. It seems the height of unreason to suppose the earth was round instead of flat, or that it moved instead of the sun, or that objects required a force to stop them when in motion, instead of a force to keep them moving, and so on.

      A person willing to fly in the face of reason, authority, and common sense must be a person of considerable self-assurance. Since he occurs only rarely, he must seem eccentric (in at least that respect) to the rest of us. A person eccentric in one respect is often eccentric in others.

      Consequently, the person who is most likely to get new ideas is a person of good background in the field of interest and one who is unconventional in his habits. (To be a crackpot is not, however, enough in itself.)

      The bolded section reminded me of Asimov's novella Sucker Bait. [wikipedia.org]

      I do see now that technology review was linked in the summary, my apologies; I missed it.

      If any of you were scared off from reading Asimov's treatise on creativity because he's a PhD, don't be. Asimov was, as I said, the Great Educator. Everything of his I've read (and I've read massive amounts) is written at an 8th or 9th grade level. Anyone should be able to understand it.

      --
      mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
      • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Wednesday October 22 2014, @04:38AM

        by mhajicek (51) on Wednesday October 22 2014, @04:38AM (#108559)

        I recall reading a book about ai, called "How to Build a Mind" or something to that effect. The author described the creative process as flawed pattern recognition filtered by good error checking. Basically the flawed pattern recognition suggests a great number of possibilities, many of which are wildly wrong. The filter then only lets the decent ones through for consideration. This is in contrast to someone with concise pattern recognition, who quickly finds a less creative answer.

        --
        The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    • (Score: 1) by Wierd0n3 on Wednesday October 22 2014, @01:19AM

      by Wierd0n3 (1033) on Wednesday October 22 2014, @01:19AM (#108490)

      http://www.asimovonline.com/oldsite/asimov_titles.html [asimovonline.com]

      the numbering for this list is 468 books, but i think some of them aren't numbered for one reason or another.

      • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Wednesday October 22 2014, @03:20PM

        by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Wednesday October 22 2014, @03:20PM (#108713) Homepage Journal

        the numbering for this list is 468 books

        Exactly. I read "Opus 500" before he became ill, he wrote several books after that. So he's written well over 500 books.

        --
        mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
  • (Score: 1) by DNied on Wednesday October 22 2014, @12:15AM

    by DNied (3409) on Wednesday October 22 2014, @12:15AM (#108476)

    Is it just my copy of Firefox, or does the Technology Review website scroll too much upon hitting the spacebar?

    • (Score: 2) by carguy on Wednesday October 22 2014, @03:44AM

      by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 22 2014, @03:44AM (#108537)

      Scrolls OK in my older Firefox v26.0
      Did they screw that up too in a newer version?

      • (Score: 1) by DNied on Wednesday October 22 2014, @10:00AM

        by DNied (3409) on Wednesday October 22 2014, @10:00AM (#108603)

        Actually, I'm using Firefox 17.0.11ESR. 1 or 2 lines of new, unread text end up under the site's top bar every time I scroll by a whole page. :-/

        Wait, I found the culprit just now... It's Pentadactyl. If I disable it, Firefox scrolls fine. I must report this to Pentadactyl's mailing list...

        Sorry for the noise.