Bakers' yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) shared a common ancestor with humans about a billion years ago.
When scientists compare human and yeast DNA, and look at their genomes they can recognize thousands of genes shared between humans and yeast. But molecular biologist Edward Marcotte of the University of Texas at Austin wanted to to test just how similar the sequences were. Could human genes be used to replace orthologous genes in yeast?
The team chose test genes based on two criteria: that the yeast version of the gene was present in a single copy and that it served a function critical to yeast cell survival. Using yeast strains in which these critical genes could be turned off at will, the team tested whether transfer of the equivalent, or orthologous, human gene could save the yeast from death
Well, it turns out that a large number of human genes can substitute for their defective counterparts in yeast and prevent the microorganisms from dying. Forty-three percent of the 414 gene replacements the team performed could indeed rescue the yeasts' growth defects.
Humans giving up their own DNA to save yeast cells!? Not so fast. There are ulterior motives at play here. After all, we're humans. We have motives.
According to Madan Babu of the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology in the U.K., The results could have significant implications for medical research.
"In the human population you have many individuals that carry single nucleotide polymorphisms and it is almost impossible to test what is the effect of [certain drugs on] these. But, if the protein can be swapped into yeast cells, then "I could put in a hundred different variants of the human ortholog and, for example, I could rapidly screen whether they are sensitive to the presence of this or that drug."
Reported in The Scientist
[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]
(Score: 3, Funny) by Snotnose on Thursday May 28 2015, @01:42AM
went through heroic measures to get rid of her yeast cells.
just sayin
When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
(Score: 2) by looorg on Thursday May 28 2015, @01:55AM
If human DNA is spliced into yest will eating bread be second degree cannibalism?!
(Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday May 28 2015, @02:14AM
Not soon enough 🏃🍞👾
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 3, Insightful) by SlimmPickens on Thursday May 28 2015, @03:50AM
Drinking human...milk isn't cannibalism. Takes a bit more than one protein that the yeast made with its own ribosome.
I suggest the line is closer to lab-grown human meat than a single protein.
(Score: 2) by gringer on Thursday May 28 2015, @04:01AM
if the protein can be swapped into yeast cells, then "I could put in a hundred different variants of the human ortholog and, for example, I could rapidly screen whether they are sensitive to the presence of this or that drug."
Or if it's a defective protein product, stick a good gene into yeast cells, then provide those yeast to patients (in the form of beer, or something else) as a tonic.
Ask me about Sequencing DNA in front of Linus Torvalds [youtube.com]
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Thursday May 28 2015, @07:22AM
Are we altruistically saving the yeasts? Or just saving them to make half human chimeras that we can text drugs on? Now if it was just about survival, and beer and wine, I would understand. But this makes no sense. Why would we do this? Is it the Jurassic Park Chaos Theory thing all over again, just in time for the theatre release of the remake? (I can see it now: "Jurassic Yeast: when almost fungal organisms ruled the world!" OK, subtitle is a bit clumsy.)
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 28 2015, @09:39AM
In
Soviet RussiaJurassic Yeast, bread eats you.(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 28 2015, @11:18AM
So the scientist created yeast cells that do not die. So if those yeast cells get exposed to a pathogen, and at some point we may have super MRSA or some Omega virus to wipe us all out.