Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday June 18 2019, @01:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the just-like-chickens dept.

Grow Faster, Grow Stronger: Speed-Breeding Crops to Feed the Future

Farmers and plant breeders are in a race against time. The world population is growing rapidly, requiring ever more food, but the amount of cultivable land is limited. Warmer temperatures have extended growth seasons in some areas — and brought drought and pests to others.

"We face a grand challenge in terms of feeding the world," said Lee Hickey, a plant geneticist at the University of Queensland in Australia. "If you look at the stats, we're going to have about 10 billion on the planet by 2050 and we're going to need 60 to 80 percent more food to feed everybody. It's an even greater challenge in the face of climate change and diseases that affect our crops that are also rapidly evolving."

[...] Dr. Hickey's team has been working on "speed breeding," tightly controlling light and temperature to send plant growth into overdrive. This enables researchers to harvest seeds and start growing the next generation of crops sooner.

Their technique was inspired by NASA research into how to grow food on space stations. They trick the crops into flowering early by blasting blue and red LED lights for 22 hours a day and keeping temperatures between 62 and 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Last November, in a paper in Nature [DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0072-z] [DX], they showed that they can grow up to six generations of wheat, barley, chickpeas and canola in a year, whereas traditional methods would only yield one or two.

On Monday in Nature Biotechnology [DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0152-9] [DX], Dr. Hickey and his team highlight the potential of speed breeding, as well as other techniques that may help improve food security. Combining speed breeding with other state-of-the-art technologies, such as gene editing, is the best way to create a pipeline of new crops, according to the researchers.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @03:39AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @03:39AM (#856884)

    Nothing wrong with effort towards making production more efficient, but what if we didn’t throw away so much food in the first place? Any effort to produce more just gets halved by the volume wasted.

    • (Score: 2) by gtomorrow on Tuesday June 18 2019, @10:56AM

      by gtomorrow (2230) on Tuesday June 18 2019, @10:56AM (#856928)

      I was coming to say something to that effect but you beat me to it. Globally speaking, we already produce enough to feed the entire planet. It's the distribution that's the problem plus, for lack of a better term, "cost effiency." It's an insanely complicated situation, far too big for my little head. How do you feed the world while still making it worthwhile for farmers? According to this article [edagricole.it] (in Italian) Sicilian citrus farmers get under €0.10 per Kg but, including the cost of harvesting and transport, the production cost is easily over €0.12! How do you feed the world instead of throwing away 1/3 of crops produced? [fao.org]

      It's up to you, eggheads!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 19 2019, @10:25AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 19 2019, @10:25AM (#857386)
      What's the problem? Don't YOU eat the food that's thrown away then like the freegans do?

      If you think there's no problem eating someone's mixed up leftovers off their plate what's your objection to eating it after it's thrown away? It's still edible food to you right?

      If you don't, what's stopping you? Very similar reasons to why the food is thrown away in the first place?
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by jdavidb on Tuesday June 18 2019, @04:02AM (4 children)

    by jdavidb (5690) on Tuesday June 18 2019, @04:02AM (#856889) Homepage Journal
    I toured a nearby aquaponics farm a couple months ago (after developing an interest in aquaponics thanks to a post from a fellow Soylentil - thanks!!). The owner showed his sprouting room which is run under LED lights, then mentioned that after sprouting he moves everything outside and depends on the sun because in his words it's just too massively expensive to do everything under artificial lights. The energy costs would be astronomical, whereas solar energy is free. So I wonder about the energy costs of what they are describing here.
    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by CZB on Tuesday June 18 2019, @04:03PM (1 child)

      by CZB (6457) on Tuesday June 18 2019, @04:03PM (#857031)

      For developing new seed varieties the high costs of an augmented artificial growth environment are worth it. You get a handful of seed that if it has a winning combination of yield and disease resistance traits you plant it out in a test plot field, and if good, its usually a 3 year process of planting your previous seed to get enough to sell to farmers. Seed wheat typically costs $14-25 per 60lbs, and is planted at a rate of 50-100lbs per acre.

      • (Score: 2) by quietus on Tuesday June 18 2019, @10:13PM

        by quietus (6328) on Tuesday June 18 2019, @10:13PM (#857206) Journal

        With that procedure, you would select for plants that grow rapidly under very artificial conditions (artificial lighting, tightly controlled irrigation, chemical nutrition and an unnatural dose of plant growth hormones) -- then plant them out in a normal field. Unless selection suddenly started to work differently, the effects might not be what you would expect.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @06:59PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @06:59PM (#857130)

      Why can't the run the LEDs off a solar panel?

      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday June 18 2019, @07:08PM

        by Freeman (732) on Tuesday June 18 2019, @07:08PM (#857134) Journal

        Solar Panels, aren't a cheap investment.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @05:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 18 2019, @05:37PM (#857081)

    buy more 7.62x39mm

(1)