Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday April 21 2014, @01:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the my-best-friend-is-a-bot dept.

The New York Times published a blog posting which documents some of the strange and interesting history of the usage of bots, including the sales of access to them, in order to essentially buy popularity on Facebook and other social networking sites as as well as their use by political parties. The article also describes how they have evolved in the never-ending battle to outwit the bot detection efforts by those sites.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday April 21 2014, @02:22PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Monday April 21 2014, @02:22PM (#33974) Homepage

    Being considered "popular" is a sure sign that whatever "it" is, "it" is idiotic. Or, put another way -- most people are stupid, so whatever they like collectively is also stupid.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by clone141166 on Monday April 21 2014, @04:54PM

    by clone141166 (59) on Monday April 21 2014, @04:54PM (#34042)

    I think I kind of agree with that statement. I am concerned that I'm agreeing with something Ethanol-fueled said though! :P

    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday April 21 2014, @08:58PM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Monday April 21 2014, @08:58PM (#34154) Journal

      Me too! Gawd, don't you just hate "me, too" posts? But if we all agree with Ethanol-fueled, doesn't that mean it is stupid, and he has just refuted his own post?