The New York Times published a blog posting which documents some of the strange and interesting history of the usage of bots, including the sales of access to them, in order to essentially buy popularity on Facebook and other social networking sites as as well as their use by political parties. The article also describes how they have evolved in the never-ending battle to outwit the bot detection efforts by those sites.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday April 21 2014, @02:22PM
Being considered "popular" is a sure sign that whatever "it" is, "it" is idiotic. Or, put another way -- most people are stupid, so whatever they like collectively is also stupid.
(Score: 2, Funny) by clone141166 on Monday April 21 2014, @04:54PM
I think I kind of agree with that statement. I am concerned that I'm agreeing with something Ethanol-fueled said though! :P
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday April 21 2014, @08:58PM
Me too! Gawd, don't you just hate "me, too" posts? But if we all agree with Ethanol-fueled, doesn't that mean it is stupid, and he has just refuted his own post?