Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday August 30 2016, @06:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-a-good-day-for-Apple dept.

TechCrunch reports on a lawsuit being brought against Apple by owners of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus who say a design defect causes the touchscreens to become unresponsive. The loss of responsiveness is often preceded by a flickering gray bar appearing across the top of the screen. iFixit discusses a few possible sources of the "Touch Disease" problem, with the most popular theory being that the Touch IC chips lose contact with the logic board due to the phone bending.

The complaint [PDF], filed in California's Northern District federal court, alleges that Apple is aware of the design flaw and has concealed it from consumers by refusing to acknowledge or repair it. It also suggests that the 5s and 5c protected against this problem in various ways, so it's not as if Apple didn't know it was a possibility. The 6s and Plus got stiffened to prevent bending, as well.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Redundant) by bob_super on Tuesday August 30 2016, @07:45PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday August 30 2016, @07:45PM (#395405)

    How many people do actually have a 6 still under warranty? The thing was designed two years ago and replaced last year. If it didn't die during the warranty, you don't have ground to complain or sue.

    I'm really starting to wonder about that new yearly tradition of "sue Apple in late August, just before they announce the new toy".

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @08:37PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @08:37PM (#395425)

      If it didn't die during the warranty, you don't have ground to complain or sue.

      Yeah...! Because the stuff we make is designed to break as soon as the warranty expires. That's how we do shit around here...
      How DARE you ask that we make stuff that is build properly and lasts! (I mean, for a +600USD gizmo, it *should* be built a bit better, no?)

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by bob_super on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:33PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:33PM (#395451)

        > How DARE you ask that we make stuff that is build properly and lasts!

        It lasted just long enough to get you to the next version, which you are required to be grateful for. Your significant other may not object to your need for a shinier replacement.
        Given your experience, would you like to buy the new one? You are free to say no, and forfeit every last dime you invested in our wonderful walled garden.

        But your expectations in terms of the lifespan of the product are irrelevant, regardless of the price. We'll let the market fairly sort out those who retain their customer from those who don't.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:44PM (#395457)

      If it didn't die during the warranty, you don't have ground to complain or sue.

      This is half correct... maybe only a one-fourth correct.

      For suing, I am not a lawyer, but I would expect you are probably right that once a system is out of warranty there is few grounds for suing (assuming it doesn't do something silly, like starting a fire). However, I imagine there could be some implicit warranty or some such based on the set of laws you are operating under... maybe...

      However, complaining is another question entirely. Imagine if the day after warranty, every Toyota (or Ford, or whatever) car just stopped working. Every single one. I'm sure there would be outrage, and rightly so. There is a societal expectation that cars will run for years, so the social and moral outrage would be absolutely justified. Whether it is legally actionable is another question, but a complaint is absolutely in order.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @10:01PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @10:01PM (#395469)

        You can sue for defective products, which is basically a form of negligence under torts law. There are also various consumer protection laws that are a bit more specific.

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday August 30 2016, @10:38PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday August 30 2016, @10:38PM (#395481)

        Agreed, I should have specified "file a complaint" (official) rather than "complain" (anyone can get pissed when their toy breaks).

        Legal minimum warranties are typically a year for consumer products, with some exceptions. I don't know of any jurisdiction which has extended minimum warranties for phones, but I'm open to learning something new today. (got a vague memory of someone mulling a two-year one for electronics)
        On another note, there are indeed social expectations with regards to some products and services, and justifiable calls for boycott of companies who violate them. But in these post-religious years we live in (at least as far as companies are concerned), we are not done hearing about the likes of Shkreli.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @11:43PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @11:43PM (#395501)

      How many people do actually have a 6 still under warranty? The thing was designed two years ago and replaced last year. If it didn't die during the warranty, you don't have ground to complain or sue.

      So if a company makes a product that it knows is defective and knowingly conceals that fact from consumers, that's OK with you as long as it lasts through its warranty period? How's your pacemaker doing? Still under warranty I hope?

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday August 31 2016, @12:02AM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @12:02AM (#395509)

        You've failed to define the word "defective".
        People have spent hundreds of billions of hours over the last two years using a product. Some have just started noticing that it was not as durable as they expected.
        Can they express their disappointment to a manufacturer which upsells on perceived quality? Sure.
        Is it "defective" ? Only if it was sold under the explicit premise that it would outlast its warranty period by a factor of two. The fact that many people bought it under a two-year contract might be perceived to infer this, but the operator is not the manufacturer.

        IANAL, and I hate Apple, but that kind of argument is like shooting fish in a barrel for them. Boycott if you're unhappy, but don't expect to gain legal standing just because you fell for the marketing.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @01:37AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @01:37AM (#395544)

          So, I would assume that you don't consider the Y2K or related bugs to be actual bugs because people used them just fine for years before the bug became apparent? What about your surgeon leaves an instrument inside, but it doesn't jiggle loose for a few years? How about a fan with giant finger-sized gaps in the grill? Or those airbags that spew metal shrapnel? Asbestos? Silicone breast implants? SUV rollovers?

          There is a reason that tort and customer protection law go beyond a simple line of being out of luck when the warranty expires.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:27AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:27AM (#395634)

      Minimum legal warranty towards customers is 2 years in most of Europe (1 year for B2B); next to that there are laws for obvious defects and factory defects that don't even need warranty.
      e.g. maybe your car comes with only 2 years warranty; but everyone expects it to last longer than that. So if the manufacturer knows there's a defect that makes it stop working after 3 years. He is legally on the hook for it (and not proper testing for the expected life of the good won't stand).

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday August 31 2016, @04:05PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @04:05PM (#395718)

        > So if the manufacturer knows there's a defect that makes it stop working after 3 years. He is legally on the hook for it

        Citation needed.
        Unless it's a clear safety issue, the manufacturer typically only provides fixes on their own dime once they tally the probability of rabid press, pissed customers, testing inquiries, and general bad publicity.
        Manufacturers have refused recalls many times (betting on apathy).

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @08:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @08:09PM (#395412)

    you'll go blind

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @11:23PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 30 2016, @11:23PM (#395492)

      Indeed, you're supposed to stick it up your ass the way that Steve intended.

      • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Wednesday August 31 2016, @02:19AM

        by rts008 (3001) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @02:19AM (#395555)

        Now I get it!
        For years I've wondered about all the hoopla with Apple's 'rounded corners'.
        I've never had any interest in Apple's crap, so I guess I (and my anus) was blissfully ignorant of this trend.
        This explains a lot of quirks I've noticed...

  • (Score: 2) by stormreaver on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:07PM

    by stormreaver (5101) on Tuesday August 30 2016, @09:07PM (#395436)

    This is going to get worse, as Apple makes the phones thinner.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @01:07AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @01:07AM (#395532)

      Not really. The 2010 MacBook Air (last major redesign) had a problem where the palmrest would bend if you rested your wrists on it. Eventually the trackpad would stop working due to this defect (easiest way to determine when purchasing second hand was to close the lid and look to see if there was a gap between the top and bottom of the clamshell).

      The 2015 MacBook is much smaller and thinner than the last MacBook Air. It does not have this problem. The bending problem was actually rectified on the 2013 MacBook Air.

      So we have evidence of Apple making something thinner and lighter while also making it less prone to bending.

      The 6s and 6s+ are *slightly* thinner than the original 6 and 6+; they do not exhibit this flexing problem even though they have been floating around in people's pockets for a year already.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday August 31 2016, @12:31AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Wednesday August 31 2016, @12:31AM (#395520) Homepage Journal

    while it didn't actually catch fire it burned through all the insulation. Had the cord been touching paper it would have caught fire.

    I filed a bug report advising apple to recall and redesign the adapters. Their response?

    They gave me the link to apple's official policy on unsolicited advice. For reasons of not wanting lawsuits, they don't accept it.

    They later recalled and resigned the adapters.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
  • (Score: 2) by quitte on Wednesday August 31 2016, @06:29PM

    by quitte (306) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @06:29PM (#395785) Journal

    After quite a bit of taking off components from iphone boards I'm convinced this issue is bigger than touchscreens failing: Their soldering process is flawed. There are lots and lots of ESD protection diodes with cold joints that get just blown away by the hot air once the underfill is gone. Similarly lots of pads that were never wet. The underfill is used to _make_ electrical contact instead of improving resistance against cracking and improving water resistance.

    In my opinion this can be solved even with a lead free process. Just make damn sure the solder wets.