Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Whistle-blowing site Wikileaks has been criticised for not doing enough to screen sensitive information found in documents released via the site. [...] What has AP found? The news organisation combed through the site and found many instances where sensitive personal information was easily viewable in documents and files.
In the worst cases the information revealed could put lives at risk or lead to people being jailed or harassed, it said.
It is not the only risk involved with information on the site. Security researcher Vesselin Bontchev found more than 3,000 links to files that contained malware. The links were in a dump of emails from Turkey's ruling political party, the AKP.
However, it has taken some action to make it harder to fall victim to malware in the AKP files - though the dangerous links have not been completely removed.
[...] Is harm being done? Human rights groups have asked Wikileaks many times to do more to censor information found in documents. They fear reprisals against aid workers, activists and civilians named in the leaked data.
In addition, AP said it had evidence that fraudsters had used credit card numbers and other personal details revealed in some documents. Other leaks have led to people losing their jobs, or have ended relationships.
The US government has condemned Wikileaks several times, saying its work has harmed diplomatic relations and put the lives of staff in sensitive positions at risk.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @01:04PM
You mean about the Wiki claims of more info yet to come, but won't be released until closer to the election? I agree there's an apparent story there about how Assange [nytimes.com] is playing an active role in manipulating the election, but I don't think that's what you're going on about though. This isn't about openness or any lofty goal, this is purely about him and his position to manipulate public opinion. There's a black pot and kettle here.