Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday January 05 2017, @06:07PM   Printer-friendly
from the this-is-truly-outrageous dept.

The trial of a Southern California-based financial scam is now set to go to the penalty phase next Tuesday to determine how much the company and the scheme's architect, Steve Chen, should pay the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Last month, a federal judge ruled that Chen's Gemcoin operation was fraudulent. "The violation took place over years and involved elaborate schemes," US District Court Judge R. Gary Klausner wrote in a summary judgment against Chen. "Defendant has shown no sign of recognition of wrongdoing and has offered no assurances against future violations." The SEC argued in court filings on December 21, 2016 that the remaining issues should be determined by the judge and not a jury and that said judge should find "in favor of sizeable penalties."

Amazingly, the amber mines did actually exist, according to a report filed late last year by the court-appointed receiver.

Some background on the Gemcoin scam and ensuing lawsuit.

How could an average person have known this was a scam? And how is this Gemcoin different, i.e. less reliable, than a more established crypto-currency like Bitcoin? Money is only money because people accept it. What makes Gemcoin a scam rather than a failed attempt at competing with Bitcoin?

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Thursday January 05 2017, @06:43PM

    by jdavidb (5690) on Thursday January 05 2017, @06:43PM (#449855) Homepage Journal
    Bitcoin "mining" isn't "burned up electricity." It is computation invested in preventing the threat of double spending.
    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday January 05 2017, @07:24PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday January 05 2017, @07:24PM (#449876)

    It's the only link between the bitcoin value and the rest of the economy, and sets a pain threshold.
    The treat of double-spending is just an inner mechanism that allows that investment, therefore setting the value expectation.

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday January 05 2017, @08:07PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Thursday January 05 2017, @08:07PM (#449900)

    Bitcoin "mining" isn't "burned up electricity." It is computation invested in preventing the threat of double spending.

    The thing is, the only reason that computation is at all useful is that some people accept Bitcoins as currency. If they didn't, then the computation in question would be utterly useless, and the resources might be better put towards, say, Folding@Home [stanford.edu].

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Thursday January 05 2017, @08:48PM

      by jdavidb (5690) on Thursday January 05 2017, @08:48PM (#449925) Homepage Journal
      Yes, their computations are making my Bitcoin quite valuable, which is why I keep trying to get as much of it as I can afford.
      --
      ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday January 05 2017, @10:07PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday January 05 2017, @10:07PM (#449960) Homepage
    So it's keeping the currency afloat by pulling up on its own shoelaces. Got it.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by jelizondo on Friday January 06 2017, @12:24AM

      by jelizondo (653) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 06 2017, @12:24AM (#450011) Journal

      Some days ago I was researching something quite similar, because someone said most money in circulation was no longer printed and threw a figure of 90-95% of all money existed only as bits on some computer.

      I could not find a real source of U.S. money but found an official U.K. [whatdotheyknow.com] reference that suggests by 2010 about 80% of the currency was simply bits:

      It is true that with quantitative easing, the £200 billion of cash injected into the economy financed by the creation of central bank reserves was done electronically.

      So in effect, pounds are not much better than bitcoin or any other currency actually. Money is worth whatever people believe it is.

      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday January 06 2017, @01:00AM

        by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Friday January 06 2017, @01:00AM (#450023) Homepage
        I think the 90-95% figure answers the question "what fraction of the economy (the flow of "money"), is simply the exchange of things with no intrinsic value?". And I think it's at the upper end of that range. That puts most of us in rather a large bubble.

        Anyone who's lived through hyperinflation knows that indeed fiat currency sometimes isn't even worth the paper it's written on. You know things are bad when notes are worth less than an equivalent square-inchage of toilet paper.

        I did once ask Graham Kentfield, while he was in power as Cheif Cashier, quite what the Bank of England would give me if I as a bearer of one of their notes were to demand the value of the note be given to me, and his response was "a replacement note, at best, probably the same note back".
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
        • (Score: 2) by jelizondo on Friday January 06 2017, @02:02AM

          by jelizondo (653) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 06 2017, @02:02AM (#450046) Journal

          Very good story. Actually he was honest, he could have pocketed the note and told you quite truthfully that it was worth nothing ;-)

          Thinking about this it dawned on me that I never tried to exchange U.S. dollars for gold, back when you supposedly could, may I would have learned something.

        • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday January 06 2017, @07:24AM

          by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday January 06 2017, @07:24AM (#450133) Journal

          Given the name of the UK currency, you should get a pound of Sterling silver. [wikipedia.org]

          --
          The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Friday January 06 2017, @02:52AM

      by jdavidb (5690) on Friday January 06 2017, @02:52AM (#450064) Homepage Journal

      That's pretty much the complete opposite of what I said. The computations are accomplishing something real. They are making a secure, unforgeable, finite supply, cryptographically sound currency.

      But if people don't think so, they don't have to have any of it. And if they have any extra and want to unload it real cheap, let me know! :)

      --
      ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 06 2017, @06:32AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 06 2017, @06:32AM (#450121)

      This is why I worry about jdavidb. Homeschooling seems to predispose one to falling for scams. Goldbug? 5-gal survival food pails? Amber?