Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Sunday April 16 2017, @08:10AM   Printer-friendly
from the I'm-a-doctor-not-a-tricorder dept.

Submitted via IRC for Cmn32480

Oscar Wilde once said that life imitates art, and science and engineering is often no exception to this. Science fiction certainly provides science types with plenty of inspiration for inventions, including holograms, teleportation, and even sonic screwdrivers.

Star Trek's all-purpose medical device, the Tricorder, has also inspired a fair few people to recreate its near-magical ability to instantly diagnose a patient. As it happens, the non-profit X-Prize Foundation were so keen to get one invented that they started a global competition to see if any mavericks would succeed.

Rather remarkably, one team has emerged victorious in their endeavor. A family-led team from Pennsylvania, appropriately named Final Frontier Medical Devices, have bagged themselves a sum of $2.5 million, with a second-place prize of $1 million going to the Taiwan-based Dynamical Biomarkers Group.

The objective of the Qualcomm Tricorder XPRIZE competition was to create a lightweight, non-invasive, handheld device that can identify 13 health conditions (12 diseases, and the very absence of disease) in 90 minutes to 24 hours with no additional help or counsel from medical professionals. Five vital health metrics, like heartbeat and respiratory function, were also required to be constantly monitored.

Source: IFLScience!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @08:29AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @08:29AM (#494730)

    I've got blue balls for green skinned females.

  • (Score: 2) by drussell on Sunday April 16 2017, @08:46AM (4 children)

    by drussell (2678) on Sunday April 16 2017, @08:46AM (#494733) Journal

    Nice try, but it is nothing like a real Tricorder...

    Good start, yes, perhaps, however....

    Continuing to try to marketingly-persuade people into calling these Star-Trek style Tricorders is about as cromulent as calling the current "hoverboards" hoverboards!! :facepalm:

    The Segway without a handlebar stick is NOT a hoverboard and this medical Tricorder is NOT a Tricorder, medical or otherwise, as nifty as the tech may be at this point....

    • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Sunday April 16 2017, @10:00AM (1 child)

      by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Sunday April 16 2017, @10:00AM (#494750) Homepage

      It is true that the device is non-invasive but it appears to require sensors attached to dongles, which means putting wires on you -- not exactly the way a hand-wavey tricorder works.

      But still, it's a step in the right direction, especially because it's basically a tablet (which provides the flexibility of off-the-shelf hardware).

      Anyway, you sound kind of salty. Not all of us can be engineer-doctor alpha-males.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Sunday April 16 2017, @02:13PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 16 2017, @02:13PM (#494805) Journal

        but it appears to require sensors attached to dongles

        Finally... I told ye they'll patch it [xkcd.com]

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:49AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:49AM (#494779)

      It's also not official until licensing fees have been paid for the name.

    • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:50PM

      by kaszz (4211) on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:50PM (#494961) Journal

      However if one can skip the rule of non-invasive then it can be useful to deal with disease in space where the nearest hospital is FAR away. That's where devices like this become really useful.

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:55AM (#494749)

    Facebook is a social disease.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by wonkey_monkey on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:52AM (2 children)

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:52AM (#494780) Homepage

    can identify 13 health conditions (12 diseases, and the very absence of disease)

    I assume that means the very absence of any of the 12 specific diseases (the article says "absence of conditions").

    Sounds a bit of a cheat to call an absence a 13th "health condition." Why not say it can identify 4096 conditions, that is to say each combination of 12 diseases?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday April 17 2017, @08:47AM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Monday April 17 2017, @08:47AM (#495165) Homepage
      unless the 12 are ranked by seriousness, and this device only tells you the most serious one you have. One of the 12, or none = 13.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Monday April 17 2017, @09:44AM

        by wonkey_monkey (279) on Monday April 17 2017, @09:44AM (#495189) Homepage

        Shows you the most serious, needs an in-app payment to show the rest.

        --
        systemd is Roko's Basilisk
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:15PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Sunday April 16 2017, @09:15PM (#494949)

    The computer in my pocket can identify a few thousand different terminal cancers and incurable degenerative diseases, all of which it believes I certainly have based on the skin rash I describe.

  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Sunday April 16 2017, @10:36PM (1 child)

    by looorg (578) on Sunday April 16 2017, @10:36PM (#494983)

    Spock (or Bones) pick up his Tricorder and 90 minutes or 24h later they are done, that would be some riveting must-see-TV.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:59PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 16 2017, @11:59PM (#495019)

      It's the best you can do with stone knives and bear skins.

  • (Score: 2) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Monday April 17 2017, @02:14AM

    by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Monday April 17 2017, @02:14AM (#495065)

    My understanding was that cell-phones now make good tricorders if not for industrial protectionism [geek.com] (obnoxious JS warning)

(1)