A company called Apis Cor has 3D printed a (tiny) house in 24 hours for $10,000, which comes out to about $275/m2.
Reconstructing Buckingham Palace at 77,000 m2 this way would cost only about $21 million. According to a 2010 estimate in The Guardian: "you could build a new energy-efficient replica of the palace for a knock-down £320m", which translates to $552 million.
So: 3D printing the palace would save over a HALF BILLION DOLLARS! Muahahaha (pinkies up!).
Video of the building process.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 24 2017, @09:20PM (2 children)
Wood-frame housing stands up to earthquakes well when compared to other building methods.
I wonder if these folks have a formula for those of us on the Pacific Rim, considering the Magnitude 7 events that have pancaked [google.com] concrete structures [google.com] in these parts.
...and a configuration that will withstand the Magnitude 8 event that we get every 150 years or so (we're overdue) would be awesome.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0, Redundant) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday April 24 2017, @10:36PM
If a disaster were to hit San Francisco, I'd rather it be a lethal disease outbreak brought in by refugees and immigrants granted sanctuary by the city -- for it would be a shame if all that classic architecture were destroyed in a quake. The population not so much.
(Score: 2) by butthurt on Tuesday April 25 2017, @04:28AM
Communities composed entirely of Styrofoamâ„¢ are already a reality in progressively minded Japan.
[...] models tested by the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) did not merely meet earthquake standards; they remained fully intact after being shaken harder than the strongest earthquakes ever recorded.
-- https://www.nachi.org/styrofoam-homes.htm [nachi.org]