Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday May 05 2017, @04:05PM   Printer-friendly
from the someone's-gotta-pay! dept.

Three families of victims killed in a 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California have sued Twitter, Google, and Facebook, alleging that the tech giants knowingly supported ISIS by allowing it to build an online presence and recruit new members for attacks:

Similar lawsuits against social-networking companies have been dismissed by U.S. courts because of a law which immunizes online providers from liability over user postings.

Court records show that in previous cases, Google, Facebook and Twitter have said, while they are sympathetic to victims, they are not liable for what happened.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by WizardFusion on Friday May 05 2017, @04:16PM (13 children)

    by WizardFusion (498) on Friday May 05 2017, @04:16PM (#504967) Journal

    My first thought on reading this was "Oh just fuck off". Some people will just about anyone just to try and get a payout. The lawyers are to blame too, they should be disbarred for this sort of ambulance chasing crap.

    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by fustakrakich on Friday May 05 2017, @04:44PM

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Friday May 05 2017, @04:44PM (#504988) Journal

      The victims' families are actually defending the shooter. He alone is responsible, and they just cannot accept that.

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    • (Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 05 2017, @05:13PM (6 children)

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday May 05 2017, @05:13PM (#505013) Journal

      This one is especially specious because (as far as I'm aware) there's no evidence they were radicalized on any of these platforms.

      This article [businessinsider.com] says:
        "One law-enforcement official told CNN that the attackers look to have been "self-radicalized." Another source said the investigation is focusing on a workplace issue about religion more than the apparent ISIS connection."

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Friday May 05 2017, @07:17PM

        by frojack (1554) on Friday May 05 2017, @07:17PM (#505094) Journal

        I rather suspect this was part of their plan for a long time. They lied on the visa applications, hid their associations with particular groups in their home-country, etc. (She more than He from all accounts). Their California Mosque affiliation, and their own Mosque-shopping should have raised a few questions.

        None of their background information was followed up or vetted until AFTER this event, because that wasn't politically correct in those days.

        The families are shown visions of a shiny pot of money over at the social media companies, and the lawyer see an even bigger payout. Even if they win, the lawyers will get all the money. Its still not politically correct to go after the Mosque, and even the lawyers are afraid to enter that arena.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @07:54PM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @07:54PM (#505111)

        Well, self-radicalized can still mean externally inspired. Sure, maybe he did not accept orders nor be recruited from foreign agents. But really, do you think he designed a gun wielding, gay killing, alliance swearing moment as an original idea?

        You know he saw crap like this on social media.

        • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 05 2017, @08:36PM

          by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday May 05 2017, @08:36PM (#505141) Journal

          You know he saw crap like this on social media.

          Our system of criminal justice is based on evidence, not conjecture.

        • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Friday May 05 2017, @09:41PM

          by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Friday May 05 2017, @09:41PM (#505170)

          You know he saw crap like this on social media.

          Even if that is true, he did not have to take the actions that he did; that was entirely on him.

        • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:05PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:05PM (#505185)

          You know he saw crap like this on social media.

          Also on TV, in newspapers, radio, podcasts, movies, cartoons, books, music, theater, games, D&D scenarios, LARPs, tap-dances, art galleries, in-person conversations, over the phone, in SMS, shouted or mumbled by the homeless, graffitied on the bathroom stall, on the back of a McDonald's menu, and probably a few other locations I've missed.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @12:45AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @12:45AM (#505633)

        self radicalized means they used the internet instead of being recruited in person like the us military does. it's radical to use the internet to learn about things instead of some authority teaching it to you like god intended. are you some kind of terrorist?

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @05:59PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @05:59PM (#505046)

      My little brothers friend died in a car accident. His parents went totally nuts, they blame everyone, including his fiance, "If you had just left earlier/later this would've not happened" etc. They lost their minds. And in this case some lawyers are taking advantage of the families.

      • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Friday May 05 2017, @07:56PM (2 children)

        by Grishnakh (2831) on Friday May 05 2017, @07:56PM (#505112)

        Maybe, but if it results in shutting down Twitter it's worth it.

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday May 05 2017, @10:06PM

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 05 2017, @10:06PM (#505187) Journal

          Maybe, but if it results in shutting down Twitter it's worth it.

          Not gonna happen, Trump needs it.

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:10PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:10PM (#505188)

          I disagree. I recall hearing that the US president can send a text message to every cell phone in the country, in case of emergency. And you just know that the Agent Orange will use that if the Twitter goes bust...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @06:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @06:26PM (#505062)

      Some people will just about anyone just to try and get a payout.

      Before somebody slips up and accidentally the whole thing

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by its_gonna_be_yuge! on Friday May 05 2017, @04:57PM (1 child)

    by its_gonna_be_yuge! (6454) on Friday May 05 2017, @04:57PM (#504997)

    vonClownStick has made so many bizarre idiotic statements on trade that it's brought the $CDN down 3%. That's hurt my company. Can I sue?

    • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Friday May 05 2017, @05:36PM

      by Nerdfest (80) on Friday May 05 2017, @05:36PM (#505028)

      If the TPP passes, perhaps.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Friday May 05 2017, @05:04PM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 05 2017, @05:04PM (#505004) Journal

    We've all lost someone. Some of our losses have been more difficult than some others, but all of our losses hurt. This particular group of people lost their loved ones in a rather spectacular manner, very publicly, to an enemy of our nation, and enemy of our way of life. I can empathize with them, sympathize with them, and I can be enraged with them. But - suing public media for the actions of those enemies?

    Sorry, boys and girls. You've just lost a good deal of empathy, sympathy, or whatever. Along with respect.

    Suck it up, grow a pair, and understand that life goes on. You're not all that very special. And, you don't get millions of millions, and at the same time dictate to all of America what is acceptable, and what is not acceptable in social media.

    What's next? If a pair of terrorists meet in a national park, before killing a bunch of people, they'll sue the national park service, claiming that the park service is responsible?

    Oh, we can go one better. A bunch of terrorists kill Granny Smith, and use her house as a base of operations. After the operations, the Smith family is sued for harboring terrorists?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @05:07PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @05:07PM (#505008)

      What's next?

      I think it will be that someone reads about bitcoin before the next big crash (maybe even yesterday/today's crash...), buys high, sells low, and then tries to sue "Google, Facebook and Twitter" for allowing them to read about it.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:11PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @10:11PM (#505189)

      A bunch of terrorists kill Granny Smith

      No, not my apple pie! I'll go Rambo on their asses if they do.

    • (Score: 2) by TheGratefulNet on Saturday May 06 2017, @01:47AM

      by TheGratefulNet (659) on Saturday May 06 2017, @01:47AM (#505269)

      >A bunch of terrorists kill Granny Smith

      THEN you can sue that famous fruit company.

      but not until then.

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Dunbal on Friday May 05 2017, @05:50PM (5 children)

    by Dunbal (3515) on Friday May 05 2017, @05:50PM (#505037)

    Might as well sue Sen. John McCain and the US government while they're at it.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by Thexalon on Friday May 05 2017, @06:34PM (2 children)

      by Thexalon (636) on Friday May 05 2017, @06:34PM (#505068)

      John McCain? Nah, he's a pretty stand-up guy for a politician. Obviously, this is all really the fault of Warner Brothers, Inc, for teaching people that guns are harmless tools for wacky hijinks involving wascally wabbits.

      --
      The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
      • (Score: 2, Funny) by Farmer Tim on Friday May 05 2017, @06:57PM

        by Farmer Tim (6490) on Friday May 05 2017, @06:57PM (#505080)
        Warner Bros is indemnified: they clearly stated it was duck season, it isn't their fault if people don't duck in time.
        --
        Came for the news, stayed for the soap opera.
      • (Score: 2) by Dunbal on Friday May 05 2017, @10:06PM

        by Dunbal (3515) on Friday May 05 2017, @10:06PM (#505186)

        Yeah. Pretty stand up guy. Especially if you're a terrorist who is looking for US money and weapons [wordpress.com] or you want a regional government toppled [o0bg.com].

    • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday May 05 2017, @07:11PM (1 child)

      by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday May 05 2017, @07:11PM (#505089) Homepage

      Too lazy to look up but I believe the shooter and his wife were immigrants. So, sue the ICE or whomever the relevant agencies are for failure of their vetting processes, and possibly the FBI and ATF for allowing the false-flag to happen.

      The bonus is that the shootings took place during the reign of Grand Emperor and Emissary to the Salafi Imam Baraq Hussein Soetoro, so it will not reflect negatively against Trump. Actually, getting straight to the point and suing Obama might be the best idea yet, it's not like there's no shortage of money from his $400,000-a-pop corporate speeches he's blathering away his few remaining smidgens of dignity about.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06 2017, @02:22AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06 2017, @02:22AM (#505280)

        Grand Emperor and Emissary to the Salafi Imam Baraq Hussein Soetoro

        lol! I think his True Name gets longer every time you use it!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @06:25PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @06:25PM (#505060)

    My dog died yesterday. I'm suing the internet.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @08:50PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 05 2017, @08:50PM (#505151)

      My dog died yesterday. I'm suing the internet.

      On the Internet, nobody knows your dog is dead.

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by c0lo on Friday May 05 2017, @10:13PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 05 2017, @10:13PM (#505190) Journal

        Oh, but someone does... it was the nyan cat that killed my dog.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Empyrean on Friday May 05 2017, @09:28PM

    by Empyrean (5241) on Friday May 05 2017, @09:28PM (#505164)

    They should also sue the ISPs and Internet backbone providers for transferring that data...

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @12:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @12:42AM (#505631)

    victims families are the whiniest of babies trying to blame society for their bad fortune and ruin life for everyone else. have some self respect. you're they stupid bitches who voted to let them live in your neighborhood now reap what you sowed!

(1)