Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday August 02 2017, @08:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the panopticon dept.

A privacy advocacy group has filed a formal legal complaint with the US Federal Trade Commission, asking the agency to begin an investigation "into Google's in-store tracking algorithm to determine whether it adequately protects the privacy of millions of American consumers."

In the Monday filing, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said it is concerned with Google's new Store Sales Management program, which debuted in May. The system allows the company to extend its online tracking capabilities into the physical world. The idea is to combine credit card and other financial data acquired from data brokers to create a singular profile as a way to illustrate to companies what goods and services are being searched for online, which result in actual in-person sales.

Because the algorithm that Google uses is secret, EPIC says, there is no way to determine how well Google's claimed anonymization feature—to mask names, credit card numbers, location, and other potentially private data—actually works. While Google has been cagey about exactly how it does this, the company has previously revealed that the technique is based on CryptDB.

"The foundational algorithm on which the Google algorithm is based has known security flaws," the complaint states. "In 2015, researchers were able to hack into a CryptDB protected database of healthcare records and access over 50 percent (sometimes 100 percent) of sensitive patient data at an individual level." (Ars covered the 2015 research into CryptDB at the time that it came out.)

Worse still, it seems practically impossible for consumers to do anything about this potential tracking in EPIC's view.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/group-wants-ftc-to-curtail-googles-linking-online-searches-to-in-store-shopping/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday August 04 2017, @02:57AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday August 04 2017, @02:57AM (#548571) Journal

    Eating in winter.

    Canning and preserves. Root vegetables. Greenhouses. It's how my family did it when I was a kid.

    Scale-ability.

    Most Americans have scaled up too much, and should scale back before their scales break. Or, perhaps you mean in terms of supply networks, in which case a CSA or green market are probably going to be more efficient because most of the produce at supermarkets is thrown away.

    Choice. Variety.

    You have more choice when growing your own or getting produce at a greenmarket. Most supermarkets in America give you the choice of red delicious apples or granny smith. My local green market has more on the order of 20 varieties. CSAs don't have that level of choice, because you get what's in season, but they also give you a lot more variety than most Americans are used to eating. How many people even know what Tuscan kale is?

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2