The Guardian has an article about a whistleblower from Cambridge Analytica, who claims to have devised a strategy to "weaponize" Facebook profiles, in order to use those profile for targeted advertising to sway the US elections in 2016.
(The Guardian headline titles are often crap). I read a few older articles, presumably by the same author: she had a series of articles in March--May 2017 about Cambridge Analytica being used as a weapon to convince British voters to vote for Brexit in the referendum. It seems that her investigative journalism encouraged this wistleblower to "come out" and be interviewed by her.
Here's one: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others (Churchill), but when does advertising cross the line into psychological warfare against your own population?
Additional coverage at The Register
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 19 2018, @01:53PM (1 child)
We improve our circumstances when we make America great, as Trump promised (Why wouldn't every politician make this obvious promise?) and strangely is actually delivering.
We degrade our circumstances if we pick Hillary, the most corrupt presidential candidate in over half a century. She didn't even like us Americans.
So it seems that Hillary crossed that line into psychological warfare against America, while Trump provides a social good.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 19 2018, @08:48PM
Yet despite Trump winning in this timeline, things still barrel headlong towards N-day.
The matrix has you.