Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday June 23 2014, @09:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-bet-they-had-no-problems-counting-that dept.

The Breakthrough Prize Foundation, which is funded by the likes of Mark Zuckerberg and investor Yuri Milner, just doled out five $3 million awards to cutting edge math projects. The Breakthrough Prizes - there have been two previously, for life science and fundamental physics - are designed to raise awareness of math and make it a more compelling career choice for the young. Sure, $15 million will do that, but really anything that makes people stop and think about how crucial math is to the technology that surrounds us is a good thing.

Prizes awarded to:

  • Simon Donaldson, Stony Brook University and Imperial College London, for the new revolutionary invariants of 4-dimensional manifolds and for the study of the relation between stability in algebraic geometry and in global differential geometry, both for bundles and for Fano varieties.
  • Maxim Kontsevich, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, for work making a deep impact in a vast variety of mathematical disciplines, including algebraic geometry, deformation theory, symplectic topology, homological algebra and dynamical systems.
  • Jacob Lurie, Harvard University, for his work on the foundations of higher category theory and derived algebraic geometry; for the classification of fully extended topological quantum field theories; and for providing a moduli-theoretic interpretation of elliptic cohomology.
  • Terence Tao, University of California, Los Angeles, for numerous breakthrough contributions to harmonic analysis, combinatorics, partial differential equations and analytic number theory.
  • Richard Taylor, Institute for Advanced Study, for numerous breakthrough results in the theory of automorphic forms, including the Taniyama-Weil conjecture, the local Langlands conjecture for general linear groups, and the Sato-Tate conjecture.
 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Freebirth Toad on Wednesday June 25 2014, @03:08AM

    by Freebirth Toad (4486) on Wednesday June 25 2014, @03:08AM (#59671)

    These prizes are just awarding the people who have already done amazing work. They were going to do amazing work with or without this money. Are people worried that some of these career mathematicians might give up academia and get jobs in industry if they aren't well enough paid? Money has nothing to do with their motivations.

    This has everything to do with how screwed up universities are. The administrations at their respective institutions will all get a percentage of this money. This percentage is the entire reason that they have famous academics as faculty. Mathematicians don't need expensive labs or equipment, but the schools need their cut, so the hotshots have to get some big awards every now and then.

    If you really wanted to incentivize people to do math research, how about using this money to provide more academic job opportunities for postdocs?