PC World has an article on why USB-C has not been a viable alternative for the 3.5mm audio jack. Problems with USB-C include variable handling of digital to audio conversion, incompatible SOCs inside the cable, and non-standard analog-passthrough. In short, the cables which contain computers themselves are not standardized in behavior and the author's conclusion is that mobile devices must have 3.5mm jacks until the USB-C cable technology gets sorted out enough that they become usable.
(Score: 3, Informative) by coolgopher on Wednesday September 12 2018, @09:09AM (2 children)
Actually, it isn't easy/cheap to waterproof, and the jack can collect dust of various levels of problemacy. Having a bung in it is just painful, and the bung is likely to get pulled off accidentally.
Less time turning the cable over again and again to work out the correct orientation, and an overall easier time plugging the cable in.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 12 2018, @10:10AM (1 child)
USB-C has less cable turning need than a 3.5mm jack? Are you serious? Have you ever seen a 3.5mm audio jack? Hint: It even works if you turn it by 15.76593 degrees. Try that with USB-C.
(Score: 2) by bryan on Wednesday September 12 2018, @07:03PM
That quoted line was talking about MicroUSB, not the round audio jack. Some people (Europe) tried very hard to make MicroUSB the one-and-only connector allowed - I'm glad they failed (the USB3 variants [wikipedia.org] of MicroUSB were especially atrocious.)