Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by azrael on Saturday July 12 2014, @10:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the editors-love-money-too dept.

Those government tax refunds, and other stimulus programs don't seem to provide the boost to the economy that government had hoped for. Nor, it turns out, are most Americans spending their paycheck as fast as they arrive. These results were discovered in new research by the University of Michigan and are based on users of a smartphone app that tracks user's spending. For 300 days, the researchers tracked a random sample of about 23,000 anonymous U.S.-based users who received regular payroll or Social Security payments.

They found that individuals shelled out about 70% more than average on the days after a payment arrived. But the bulk of this tended to be monthly bills that were scheduled to occur soon after funds arrived.

So the researchers picked out a single type of spending that's easily influenced by the perception of disposable income: cash shelled out for fast food and coffee. Here, most people's spending barely increased after a paycheck, the team reports online today in Science (paywalled). Obviously, those with lower income tended to spend more of their paycheck than others, and some do in fact spend whatever is available. But by and large, the average user did not increase discretionary spending in response to a bump in income.

The finding suggests that tax rebates and other cash infusions may not boost the economy as some have suggested, as most people would probably save the windfall for a rainy day, and money doesn't necessarily burn a hole in our pockets. The finding could help governments better stimulate the economy. If they could find ways to target tax rebates to people who have little cash in reserve (not to mention pent up demand), the payments might stimulate spending more effectively because these people are more likely to spend it. Harnessing the power of the spendthrift, as it were.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 12 2014, @11:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 12 2014, @11:32AM (#68057)

    > Seems like a silly type of spending to focus on...

    It sounds like they made the common error of picking something easy to measure because it is very simple and then extrapolating that to apply to something that was much more complicated, which by definition doesn't work the same way as the simple thing.

    For all they know, the money was saved up for a larger purchase at the end of the month, like a new appliance or a down-payment on a new car.

  • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Saturday July 12 2014, @06:33PM

    by davester666 (155) on Saturday July 12 2014, @06:33PM (#68192)

    Or even to catch-up on overdue bills.