Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Sunday December 30 2018, @10:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong dept.

The Trump administration EPA says regulations to reduce power plant emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants are too costly and should no longer be considered legally "appropriate and necessary."

In another proposed reversal of an Obama-era standard, the Environmental Protection Agency Friday said limiting mercury and other toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants is not cost-effective and should not be considered "appropriate and necessary."

The EPA says it is keeping the 2012 restrictions in place for now, in large part because utilities have already spent billions to comply with them. But environmental groups worry the move is a step toward repealing the limits and could make it harder to impose other regulations in the future.

In a statement, the EPA said it is "providing regulatory certainty by transparently and accurately taking account of both costs and benefits."

The National Mining Association welcomed the move, calling the mercury limits "punitive" and "massively unbalanced."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:00PM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:00PM (#780060) Journal

    Nice rant, I guess. Unfortunately, you didn't say anything more substantial than most candidates for public office. Seriously, read over that. There's nothing more than a big bag of wind there.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:42PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:42PM (#780074)

    yeah, but you say that as if your "trump is right, EPA regulations don't always make senses" mythology has any meat on it

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:49PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:49PM (#780080) Journal

      So, uhhhh - you're saying that the EPA can make no errors? They have something like the Papal Infallibility? Got it - I'm dealing with a zealot here.

  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday December 31 2018, @06:42PM

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday December 31 2018, @06:42PM (#780344) Journal

    Well, he is right about one thing. No major industry can survive without being propped up by the government, energy, agriculture, transportation, your tax dollars at work there. On the other hand, price stabilization is a thing, but I would also like to see the petrol industry compete on even footing with the alternatives. Petrol has the advantage of being easier to control and ration, so it's easy to understand why it is promoted more than the others.

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..