SoylentNews

Potentially Good Ideas Buried in US House of Representatives' First Bill: HR1

posted by martyb on Sunday January 06 2019, @08:33PM   
from the stopped-clock dept.

The Mighty Buzzard writes:

Securityweek has a look at the bits of HR1 with digital election security implications running:

The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives has unveiled its first Bill: HR1, dubbed the 'For the People Act'. It has little chance of getting through the Republican-controlled Congress, and even less chance of being signed into law by President Trump.

Nevertheless, HR1 lays down a marker for current Democrat intentions; and it is likely that some of the potentially bi-partisan elements could be spun out into separate bills with a greater chance of progress.

One of these is likely to include the section on election security. This has been a major issue since the meddling by Russian-state hackers in the 2016 presidential election, and the subsequent realization on how easy it would be for interested parties (both foreign hackers and local activists) to influence election outcomes.

I'm all for secure and accountable elections but the feds are going to need to be careful and deliberate in what they mandate vs. what they place conditions for funding on. They do have significant authority as far as election laws go but their power is more deep than broad; most specifics are legally up to the states. Just because something is a good idea doesn't mean they currently have the legal authority necessary to do it.

---

Original Submission

• Re:No Thanks Re:No Thanks (Score: 1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @09:21PM (3 children)

  by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @09:21PM (#782850)

  This may be relevant to your interests, though I'm not certain what HR1 has to do with it. Is it a rider nobody's mentioned? In any case: European Jewish Association slanders left and urges dialogue with far-right [wsws.org].

  Parent

  Starting Score:	0		points
  Moderation		+1
  Offtopic=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
  Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier		0
  Total Score:		1

• Re:No Thanks Re:No Thanks (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:12PM (2 children)

  by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:12PM (#782893)

  Daily reminder that Jewish bankers funded Hitler's rise to power.

  Parent

  • Comment Below Threshold

    Re:No Thanks (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:27PM (#782903)

    There are three main international banks, the world bank, the international monetary fund, and the bank for international settlements. The last is the shadiest, and has proven impossible to disband:

    The fact that top level German industrialists and advisors sat on the BIS board seemed to provide ample evidence of how the BIS might be used by Hitler throughout the war, with the help of American, British and French banks. Between 1933 and 1945 the BIS board of directors included Walther Funk, a prominent Nazi official, and Emil Puhl, as well as Hermann Schmitz, the director of IG Farben, and Baron von Schroeder, the owner of the J.H. Stein Bank [de].[10]

    The 1944 Bretton Woods Conference recommended the "liquidation of the Bank for International Settlements at the earliest possible moment". This resulted in the BIS being the subject of a disagreement between the U.S. and British delegations. The liquidation of the bank was supported by other European delegates, as well as Americans (including Harry Dexter White and Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau Jr.).[11] But it was opposed by John Maynard Keynes, head of the British delegation.

    Keynes went to Morgenthau hoping to prevent or postpone the dissolution, but the next day it was approved. However, the liquidation of the bank was never actually undertaken.[12] In April 1945, the new U.S. president Harry S. Truman and the British government suspended the dissolution, and the decision to liquidate the BIS was officially reversed in 1948.[13]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements [wikipedia.org]

    Parent

  • Re:No Thanks (Score: 0, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 06 2019, @11:37PM (#782912)

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UnknownTradeCo/comments/5vj55z/how_hitler_defied_the_international_bankers_and/ [reddit.com]:

    [Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow] quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers' agent Hjalmar Schacht. The bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money. (Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)

    Really? "Testimony" from one of Stalin's show trials during the Great Terror?

    The impression I have of the general strategy of neo-Nazis to overthrow the corrupt international capitalist banking system (institutions such as the IMF are large drivers of austerity policies) is to, for whatever reason, attack all Jews, instead of attacking the capitalist banking system. Thus the capitalist banking system lives to see another day thanks to your successfully misdirected rage.

    Parent