Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday February 27 2019, @09:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the We-[want-to]-see-what-you-did-there dept.

FBI: End-to-End Encryption Is an Infectious Problem

Just in case there were any lingering doubts about U.S. law enforcement's stance on end-to-end encryption, which prevents information from being read by anyone but its intended recipient, FBI executive assistant director Amy Hess told the Wall Street Journal this week that its use "is a problem that infects law enforcement and the intelligence community more and more so every day."

The quote was published in a piece about efforts from the UK, Australia and India to undermine end-to-end encryption. All three countries have passed or proposed legislation that compels tech companies to supply certain information to government agencies. The laws vary in their specifics, including restrictions on to what information law enforcement can request access, but the gist is that they don't want any data to be completely inaccessible.

Related: FBI Chief Calls for National Talk Over Encryption vs. Safety
FBI Failed to Access 7,000 Encrypted Mobile Devices
DOJ: Strong Encryption That We Don't Have Access to is "Unreasonable"
Five Eyes Governments Get Even Tougher on Encryption
Apple Speaks Out Against Australian Anti-Encryption Law; Police Advised Not to Trigger Face ID
Australia Set to Pass Controversial Encryption Law
Split Key Cryptography is Back... Again – Why Government Back Doors Don't Work


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 28 2019, @06:58PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 28 2019, @06:58PM (#808267)

    That one still stands while you are on private property and have not been issued a warrant or demonstrated probable cause for a search.

    By the time you're in court arguing against the police's version of the story and what's probable cause then you've already been punished. The cop however may even be getting paid overtime to show up to court and in the event that things start looking like there could be personal repercussions they'll have their lawyers deal with it and you'll have a hard time paying for an attorney that has the same level of expertise arguing things like probable cause.
    After that you'll need to move or else you're getting pulled over for "swerving" and then getting searched for the "suspicious odor" in your car every single time your plate pops up on their buddy's automated plate scanner.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 28 2019, @07:01PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 28 2019, @07:01PM (#808270)

    Forgot to finish this thought. If you have to defend yourself in court you've already been punished.