Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday July 29 2014, @01:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the eBobby dept.

The City of London Police have started putting banner ads over sites they believe are offering copyright infringing content.

The City of London police has started placing banner advertisements on websites believed to be offering pirated content illegally.

The messages, which will appear instead of paid-for ads, will ask users to close their web browsers.

The move comes as part of a continuing effort to stop piracy sites from earning money through advertising.

Police said the ads would make it harder for piracy site owners to make their pages look authentic.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Adamsjas on Tuesday July 29 2014, @05:56PM

    by Adamsjas (4507) on Tuesday July 29 2014, @05:56PM (#75157)

    If it were the UK government, it might be ok.

    But why is a CITY police force focusing on this? Are there no parking violations, street crime, drug sales, muggings, where their time and money would be better spent?

    Not sure how they fund police forces in the UK, but I wouldn't want my local cops spending a dime on such things out of my local taxes.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Tuesday July 29 2014, @08:32PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 29 2014, @08:32PM (#75246) Journal

    Look up "City of London Police" (Note that the "City of London" is not the city of London.)

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday July 29 2014, @11:23PM

      by frojack (1554) on Tuesday July 29 2014, @11:23PM (#75306) Journal

      But doesn't that make his point even stronger?
      Why is this tiny police force for a tiny area of London pursuing national issues?

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by tomtomtom on Wednesday July 30 2014, @11:50AM

        by tomtomtom (340) on Wednesday July 30 2014, @11:50AM (#75472)

        Simply put, they are involved because we don't have a national police force (well Scotland now does but that's very recent; this is also ignoring other semi-police units like the National Crime Agency).

        Over time, the local forces divided up "specialist" matters between them for one force or another to lead on because the expertise wasn't worth duplicating many times over. The City of London had the "best" history of investigating complex fraud as a result of being involved in a lot of financial crime investigations (legitimately within their geographic remit). This later expanded out into "economic crime" which is where this fits in. They were also e.g. the lead force investigating horse-race fixing allegations in the past despite no horse racing going on within the square mile.

        This is not some nasty conspiracy by shadowy financial powers as you often see suggested - it's just an artefact of the history of policing in the UK. And I'd say it's very likely being done with the encouragement and probably outright funding of central government which is who should really be taking the blame here.

  • (Score: 2) by lhsi on Tuesday July 29 2014, @10:13PM

    by lhsi (711) on Tuesday July 29 2014, @10:13PM (#75281) Journal

    The area covered by the City of London police is essentially the financial district. About 7000 residents but 300,000 people commute to it.