Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 13 2019, @02:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-many-nuns-would-a-nunchuck-chuck-if-a-nunchuck-could-chuck-nuns? dept.

In Arizona, It's No Longer A Felony To Own Nunchucks

It's officially legal to own nunchucks in Arizona. On Friday, the state's Republican governor, Doug Ducey signed a bill removing nunchucks from a list of prohibited weapons that includes bombs, gun silencers and automatic firearms.

Until Friday, people who practiced martial arts faced the risk of a felony charge for possessing nunchucks in public. Arizona only allowed the weapons to be used in preparation for martial arts competitions.

"The average person can do far more damage using a baseball bat than nunchucks," Arizona Rep. John Kavanaugh, a Republican, told the Associated Press before the legislation passed. "They're not dangerous to anybody. And we really should let kids and adults who want to do martial arts activities legally possess them."

Several states, including Arizona, adopted the ban in the 1970s as martial arts movies, like ones starring Bruce Lee, became popular, according to the Arizona Daily Star. Last year, a federal judge struck down a similar ban in New York ruling that nunchucks were protected under the Second Amendment, the Washington Post reported.

Nunchaku, not dangerous? That's an insult to the Okinawan people!

The exact origin of nunchaku is unclear. Allegedly adapted by Okinawan farmers from a non-weapon implement for threshing rice, it was not a historically popular weapon because it was ineffective against the most widely used weapons of that time such as samurai swords, and few historical techniques for its use still survive.

Previously: New York State's Ban on Nunchaku ("Nunchucks") Found Unconstitutional


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday May 13 2019, @07:19PM (11 children)

    by bob_super (1357) on Monday May 13 2019, @07:19PM (#843118)

    > They're less dangerous than a hardwood dowel of the same length and diameter.

    But they can be carried and concealed a lot easier. Few (wannabe-)gang members walk around with a 2-to-3 ft long stick.
    Its in the same category as brass knuckles : They are easily taken with you, and will make any stupid fight a lot more deadly.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by PinkyGigglebrain on Monday May 13 2019, @07:55PM

    by PinkyGigglebrain (4458) on Monday May 13 2019, @07:55PM (#843128)

    a pair of 18-24 inch sticks can be carried quite easily under a jacket, and they can be quite effective if you know how to use them. [youtube.com]

    --
    "Beware those who would deny you Knowledge, For in their hearts they dream themselves your Master."
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday May 13 2019, @09:43PM (9 children)

    A lead or steel pipe of 18" length if you prefer then. I was only using similar materials for a more precise comparison based on size. Pipes do more damage and do not have near the painful learning curve to be able to use against your opponent rather than against yourself.

    Face it, they were banned for the same reason that people are trying to ban "assault rifles". Not because of actual danger but because they're scary.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.