Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday October 10 2019, @08:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the moving-on dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Australia's incumbent telco Telstra has announced it is planning to switch off its 3G network in June 2024 and refarm the spectrum for its 5G network.

The telco said until that time, it would look to boost its 4G coverage to a "materially equivalent size and reach" compared to the 3G network. To achieve this, Telstra will look at areas serviced only by 3G and assess its product portfolio, the company said.

[...] 5G services were switched on by Telstra a year ago, with the launch covering 50 base stations.

The telco expects 5G to be a strong growth engine, CEO Andy Penn said during the company's annual retail shareholder day last month.

"ARPUs1 tend to increase, particularly in the early stages of a rollout," Penn said. "So we see that happening in 5G as well as we look forward over the next couple of years."

Penn added that with second generation 5G chips heading into devices later this year, the company expects 5G uptake to increase.

"I think what history has shown us is that, as we put these technologies in the hands of our customers, they respond very positively and it's tended to lead to improvement in revenues across the industry," he said.

[1] ARPU - Average revenue per user


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday October 10 2019, @04:25PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday October 10 2019, @04:25PM (#905265) Homepage
    But with only 10 years between 2G and 3G, that would make 2027 an arguable time to turn off 3G, which is only 3 years later than this. 33 years rather than 36 years, that's only a 10% shortening.

    Arguable, but not necessarily right. The data provision in 2G was utterly terrible, completely useless (way worse than dial-up), that only really picked up with 2.5G, and only actually became practical with EDGE (or "2.75G" if you prefer).

    But 3G hit the ground running, and I would say was actually perfectly practical for simple remote tasks. So will it ever become "utterly terrible, completely useless"? One could argue not. In particular in the era of "apps" which are fatter clients less reliant on high bandwith and low latency. 3G chips (that don't need to support 2G) will possibly even become as small, cheap and low power as the USB chips in use when next-next-generation alternatives were the next sliced bread, a few-cent solution that's already proven - who wouldn't want to chose that, if you know your bandwidth needs are low? So could it be that 3G will just be kept going until the towers the antennae are on rust away?
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2