Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday March 21 2020, @11:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-eyes-are-the-window dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Hanwang, the facial-recognition company that has placed 2 million of its cameras at entrance gates across the world, started preparing for the coronavirus in early January.

Huang Lei, the company’s chief technical officer, said that even before the new virus was widely known about, he had begun to get requests from hospitals at the centre of the outbreak in Hubei province to update its software to recognise nurses wearing masks.

[...] If three or five clients ask for the same thing . . . we’ll see that as important,” said Mr Huang, adding that its cameras previously only recognised people in masks half the time, compared with 99.5 percent accuracy for a full face image.

[...] The company now says its masked facial recognition program has reached 95 percent accuracy in lab tests, and even claims that it is more accurate in real life, where its cameras take multiple photos of a person if the first attempt to identify them fails.

“The problem of masked facial recognition is not new, but belongs to the family of facial recognition with occlusion,” Mr Huang said, adding that his company had first encountered similar issues with people with beards in Turkey and Pakistan, as well as with northern Chinese customers wearing winter clothing that covered their ears and face.

Counter-intuitively, training facial recognition algorithms to recognize masked faces involves throwing data away. A team at the University of Bradford published a study last year showing they could train a facial recognition program to accurately recognize half-faces by deleting parts of the photos they used to train the software.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 23 2020, @05:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 23 2020, @05:59PM (#974502)

    If you're concerned about it coming here, you shouldn't be. We have democracy here.

    No, the US functions more as an oligarchy.

    So if it does come here and is put in place by our government, that's because we the people wanted it, as seen by how we vote. If we didn't want it, we would be sure to vote out anyone who tries to bring dystopian mass surveillance here.

    The problem is, the same morons who succumb to propaganda and vote in favor of totalitarianism affect the rest of us, and our Supreme Court is packed with authoritarians. If the Supreme Court can get away with approving of Japanese internment camps and other abominations, despite them being blatantly and absolutely unconstitutional, it can get away with anything.

    So of course I'm going to be worried. We barely have a democracy currently, and idiots will vote in favor of destroying what little democracy we do have.