Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday April 26 2020, @05:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the Hubble,-Hubble,-toil-and-trouble dept.

The Hubble Space Telescope launched 30 years ago:

The mission was novel from the beginning, with a planned orbit at 612km above the planet's surface requiring the vehicle to fly higher than any shuttle mission to date. Telescope deployment came a day after the shuttle reached orbit and involved a complicated sequence of events. After disconnecting the telescope from the shuttle's power supply, astronauts would use a robotic arm to move the instrument from the shuttle's payload bay, open its solar arrays, and finally release the telescope.

"From the time we disconnected Hubble from the shuttle's power, we had two clocks running," explained Bill Reeves, who was the mission's flight director and supervised operations from Johnson Space Center. "The telescope was on battery power from that moment, and there was a limited supply. And with the telescope attached to the arm, the shuttle had to be on free drift, as thruster firings might damage the instrument."

When ground controllers commanded the telescope to begin unfurling its two solar arrays, one of the arrays did not do so properly. Minutes turned into hours as engineers on the ground troubleshot the problem.

[...] As Reeves contemplated whether to give [an] egress order, engineers said they thought they had identified a problem with the software that monitored tension in the solar array. Making a small change, they proposed, would fix the problem. This worked, and the second solar array unfurled beside its companion.

[...] For a while, [STS-31 pilot Charlie] Bolden recalls being on top of the world after landing. Like everyone else, the astronauts eagerly awaited the first image from the telescope, a shot of a distant star named HD96755 captured on May 20, 1990. Their elation was crushed when the first picture turned out to be blurry and only marginally better than ground-based telescopes. Soon, astronomers realized the telescope had a warped mirror.

[...] NASA activated its Apollo 13 muscle memory and, over the course of the next three years, planned a meticulous servicing mission to correct the mirror, upgrade its instruments, and bring a new and more powerful set of solar panels. In December 1993, Space Shuttle Endeavour flew an 11-day servicing mission that included five spacewalks. Story Musgrave, who had worked on Hubble's development since the early 1970s, served as lead spacewalker.

[...] What followed, however, is a good story. Over the last 27 years, and four additional servicing missions, NASA and its astronauts have upgraded the instrument beyond the dreams of its original planners. Hubble has emerged as arguably the most important scientific instrument of all time, both enlightening astronomers about the nature of the Universe as well as transcending science into popular culture.

"I was not ready for the power of the observations," Musgrave said. "Compared to some of the big telescopes on Earth, Hubble is such a tiny telescope. But it's got a clear view. People love the images, not just for the science but for their beauty. It says something about who we are."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Sunday April 26 2020, @05:46AM (2 children)

    by Fnord666 (652) on Sunday April 26 2020, @05:46AM (#987209) Homepage

    My understanding is that the mirror was built perfectly to spec. It’s just that the spec was wrong.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2020, @09:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2020, @09:57AM (#987232)

    gay aliens protest seti@home?

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by aristarchus on Sunday April 26 2020, @10:07AM (1 child)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday April 26 2020, @10:07AM (#987234) Journal

    History for Millennial astrophysics? We all know what happened. This is ancient earth history, something that as an astronomer, I should know something about. There are better ways to celebrate the anniversary of Hubble, than takyon bitching about public sector, public funded science, yet again.

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by aristarchus on Sunday April 26 2020, @09:56PM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday April 26 2020, @09:56PM (#987376) Journal

      Or, possibly there are not on SoylentNews. Is a Trump/Bush style of intellectual incuriosity the reason all the astrophysics articles on SN get so few comments? Or a libertariantard pushing of ways to move taxes back into private corporate hands?

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2020, @07:15PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 26 2020, @07:15PM (#987335)

    I'm not going to say much (maybe a different AC can fill in with few links, some info is out there public to find) but the Hubble is only one of many of that type of instrument.

    The others are pointed _down_.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 27 2020, @01:40PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 27 2020, @01:40PM (#987518)

      I don't have any links handy, but I was quite shocked by the Wikipedia article linked earlier about the problem with Hubble's optics leaving out this bit of history. The classified sats using the same tech apparently had the same problem and had it already solved by the time the Hubble got shot into orbit, but the spies couldn't tell NASA. So they had to solve this problem all over again.

      This doesn't seem to fit in at all with the "wrongly assembled qualiity control instrument" story the Wikipedia article cites as historical fact.

      IIRC the classified sats based on the same tech are part of the Keyhole family.

(1)