Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday May 20 2020, @08:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-stupidity-it-hurts-it-burns! dept.

Cell-tower attacks by idiots who claim 5G spreads COVID-19 reportedly hit US:

US warns carriers to boost security, citing reports of attacks in several states.

The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly issuing alerts to wireless telecom providers and law enforcement agencies about potential attacks on cell towers and telecommunications workers by 5G/coronavirus conspiracy theorists. The DHS warned that there have already been "arson and physical attacks against cell towers in several US states."

The preposterous claim that 5G can spread the coronavirus, either by suppressing the immune system or by directly transmitting the virus over radio waves, led to dozens of tower burnings in the UK and mainland Europe. Now, the DHS "is preparing to advise the US telecom industry on steps it can take to prevent attacks on 5G cell towers following a rash of incidents in Western Europe fueled by the false claim that the technology spreads the pathogen causing COVID-19," The Washington Post reported last week.

<no-sarcasm>
FACT: 5G mobile networks DO NOT spread COVID-19!
</no-sarcasm>


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by canopic jug on Wednesday May 20 2020, @09:11AM (12 children)

    by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 20 2020, @09:11AM (#996805) Journal

    My position is: irrelevant. 5g is as useful, and as potentially dangerous as police checkpoints at every corner of the street. Do not want except in corner cases.

    I figure that is what may be behind these strawman arguments. Nutjobs get wound up via Facebook and Twitter by those paid to wind them up and by extension discredit any and all critique of 5G. Protocol-wise, I have heard that it is more or less the same as 4G. Frequency-wise, the signals don't reach very far and you'd need towers every few meters for coverage. Take the case of the demo where the tower could not provide coverage for even a single American Football stadium. With that density of towers, it is great for surveillance but prohibitive to deploy and maintain.

    Another factor is that one 5G frequency range does a number on weather radar. That brings climate change into the fight and there are some major interests that want to ignore that until it is too late.

    --
    Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Redundant=1, Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @02:54PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @02:54PM (#996910)

    5G mMIMO means directional, means basically rays of uncheckable intensity and a far wider frequency range than the nominal one. So it's not like previous Gs which haven't been much tested either before deployment. My personal impression is that with the advent of cellphones the IQ went down >10 points. Can't say if because of emissions or because the brain is occupied sorting inputs instead of reasoning.

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by hemocyanin on Wednesday May 20 2020, @05:15PM (3 children)

      by hemocyanin (186) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @05:15PM (#996983) Journal

      I was thinking about this the other day. I'm old enough to have gone from party line to smartphone, so I do remember how things used to be. Anyway, what got me on the topic was that I was sitting around on my patio after a day working and as I went to grab my phone to look at a news aggregator site, it struck me that the evening was beautiful, I could think about anything I wanted to whether fun or utilitarian, and that by grabbing my phone and scrolling through news headlines which have no real bearing on my life, I'd be wasting this time by missing the beauty around me and the opportunity to think. So I grabbed my phone and looked at headlines.

      These things are fucking heroin -- I've never done heroin but I expect at first it is fun and then over time, it evolves into a maintenance thing and all the luster wears off. I think that's where I am with my phone. A fucking addict and the device is ruining me.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by acid andy on Wednesday May 20 2020, @09:59PM (1 child)

        by acid andy (1683) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @09:59PM (#997114) Homepage Journal

        It'll probably wear out and break in a year or two. That might give you a chance to kick the habit. Not all phones are smart, yet.

        *Grabs laptop and scrolls through SoylentNews comments*

        A fucking addict. Yes, I know what you mean.

        *Back to more scrolling*

        --
        If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
        • (Score: 1) by hemocyanin on Thursday May 21 2020, @02:24AM

          by hemocyanin (186) on Thursday May 21 2020, @02:24AM (#997203) Journal

          I replaced the camera when the old one went bad but did it a little wrong and so the screen doesn't stick down to the backlight in one corner perfectly -- a good way for water to egress. The on/off button is going too -- I have to really jam it hard to get it to turn on. It's been this way for more than a year now (screen and button) but my disgust with these devices has meant I haven't had any motivation to replace it. From to time I muse on fixing the on/off button sort of half hoping if I did, I'd screw it up. Then I'd be faced with the choice.

      • (Score: 2) by dwilson on Thursday May 21 2020, @03:56PM

        by dwilson (2599) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 21 2020, @03:56PM (#997421) Journal

        I was thinking about this the other day. I'm old enough to have gone from party line to smartphone, so I do remember how things used to be.

        I'm only in my mid-thirties, and still old enough to have gone from party line to smart phone.

        --
        - D
  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday May 20 2020, @04:35PM (6 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @04:35PM (#996963) Journal

    I figure that is what may be behind these strawman arguments. Nutjobs get wound up via Facebook and Twitter by those paid to wind them up...

    The wound up people actually exist, though, so it's no longer a strawman. Regardless of whether it's based on an astroturf campaign...

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by canopic jug on Wednesday May 20 2020, @05:20PM (5 children)

      by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 20 2020, @05:20PM (#996984) Journal

      Close. It's not a mutually exclusive situation. So now there are two problems. The one is that which the strawman arguments are distracting from and the other is the wound up nutjobs.

      You could say there are more problems since, as mentioned, some group is winding them up and, presumably, they are doing it on behalf of some more remote interests. Another is the control that Facebook weilds over mass public opinion.

      --
      Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
      • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday May 20 2020, @06:08PM (3 children)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @06:08PM (#997014) Journal

        But again, it is NOT a strawman argument because people actually are saying that 5G causes coronavirus.

        A strawman is when you rebut an argument nobody made. People ARE making that argument and we have the burning cellphone towers to prove it. [go.com]

        • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:23PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:23PM (#997072)

          Nitpick not pertaining to this discussion but "strawman is when you rebut an argument nobody made" is not quite correct, in a debate it means an argument that you did not make. Not that the argument has never existed anywhere ever.

          • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Wednesday May 20 2020, @10:01PM (1 child)

            by captain normal (2205) on Wednesday May 20 2020, @10:01PM (#997115)
            --
            Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts"- --Daniel Patrick Moynihan--
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2020, @08:26PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2020, @08:26PM (#997563)

              Why did you share that video, it says the same thing as the other AC?

      • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:28PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2020, @07:28PM (#997074)

        some group is winding them up

        My money is on the russians. Anything to sow discord in the West.