Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday August 09 2020, @05:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the counting-where-it-counts dept.

England to revise DOWN its Covid-19 death toll by up to 10 percent after bizarre 'counting mishap':

Public Health England [(PHE)] currently counts the deaths of all people who have tested positive for Covid-19 among the coronavirus fatality total whether their death was related to the disease or not, an error which was noted in July, prompting the suspension of the daily death toll and an "urgent review" of protocol.

In other words, as many as 4,170 fatalities could be wiped off England's current Covid-19 death toll of 41,686.

According to reports in UKmedia, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock will bring all coronavirus fatality reporting in line with Scotland and Northern Ireland public health models, wherein a death is marked as Covid-19-related only if it occurs within 28 days of a positive test.

[...]

In England, of all deaths that occurred up to 24 July (registered up 1 August), 49,017 involved #COVID19. For the same period, @DHSCgovuk reported 41,143 COVID-19 deaths https://t.co/hKH0tTRb2W

— Office for National Statistics (ONS) (@ONS) August 4, 2020

If the system is not updated, the total of roughly 265,000 confirmed cases in England would all eventually be counted as Covid-19 fatalities regardless of the actual cause of death.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday August 09 2020, @07:06AM (7 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Sunday August 09 2020, @07:06AM (#1033691) Journal

    Just burn all the books and start over

    I hope people are more awake next time they vote

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by leon_the_cat on Sunday August 09 2020, @12:19PM (1 child)

    by leon_the_cat (10052) on Sunday August 09 2020, @12:19PM (#1033761) Journal

    no they need to be more asleep next time they vote.

    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday August 09 2020, @06:30PM

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Sunday August 09 2020, @06:30PM (#1033931) Journal

      No, they need to feel the pain. Make them know what they are doing

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Sunday August 09 2020, @04:48PM (4 children)

    by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2020, @04:48PM (#1033876)

    Well, at the next UK vote, "get Brexit done" won't be as effective a rallying call.

    (At least I hope so: if it hasn't been "done" by then, the electorate are going to be really fed up with it.)

    Mind you, there'll be entertaining stuff in the Scottish Parliament elections next year: SNP set for a landslide majority, but the UK Government's line is the can't have another independence referendum because the one in 2014 was meant to settle things for a generation. (Never mind that one of the main arguments for staying in the UK was continued membership of the E.U. :/ )

    • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2020, @06:14PM (3 children)

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday August 09 2020, @06:14PM (#1033923) Journal
      It has already been done, kazzie. It became formal on 31 Jan 2020, and they have also formally notified the EU that they will not be asking for an extension to the ongoing trade negotiation phase. The date for extending the stay within the EU has long gone.
      • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Monday August 10 2020, @06:07AM (2 children)

        by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Monday August 10 2020, @06:07AM (#1034232)

        Yes. I await the end of the negotiation phase in December with curiosity. There'll probably be a last-minute flurry of activity to get something done by the deadline. The last UK election demonstrated that a majority wanted the whole process to be over and done with, and the current Government seem eager to be able to show that's (superficially, at least) the case.

        Whatever agreement (or lack of agreement) is made, there'll be a portion of UK society that will be up in arms about it. I just wonder which it will be...

        (And, as many political comentators have noted, the new trading relationship between the UK and EU is going to take the best part of a decade to be hammered out properly.)

        • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday August 10 2020, @07:51AM (1 child)

          by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday August 10 2020, @07:51AM (#1034252) Journal

          The trade negotiations have already started. The first formal meeting was in January, and since the arrival of CV-19, have mostly been conducted via teleconferencing. There is currently an impasse. The EU still want the UK to be bound by European Law as a result of any future agreement, and the UK is saying that the reason that we voted to leave was because we want to be controlled by our own laws. I think that they are both waiting to see who will blink first.

          • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Tuesday August 11 2020, @09:39AM

            by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 11 2020, @09:39AM (#1034820)

            Yes. And if neither blinks, then the transitional arrangements will come to an end in December. Personally, I expect a small "filler" agreement to tide things over while negotiations continue on the trickier stuff, but who knows what'l happen in the run-up to the cliff edge?

            It's nice to have the political and economic strife of Brexit, to distract us from the political and economic strife of Covid.