SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This Twist on Schrödinger’s Cat Paradox Has Major Implications for Quantum Theory:
What does it feel like to be both alive and dead?
That question irked and inspired Hungarian-American physicist Eugene Wigner in the 1960s. He was frustrated by the paradoxes arising from the vagaries of quantum mechanics—the theory governing the microscopic realm that suggests, among many other counterintuitive things, that until a quantum system is observed, it does not necessarily have definite properties. Take his fellow physicist Erwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment in which a cat is trapped in a box with poison that will be released if a radioactive atom decays. Radioactivity is a quantum process, so before the box is opened, the story goes, the atom has both decayed and not decayed, leaving the unfortunate cat in limbo—a so-called superposition between life and death. But does the cat experience being in superposition?
Wigner sharpened the paradox by imagining a (human) friend of his shut in a lab, measuring a quantum system. He argued it was absurd to say his friend exists in a superposition of having seen and not seen a decay unless and until Wigner opens the lab door. "The 'Wigner's friend' thought experiment shows that things can become very weird if the observer is also observed," says Nora Tischler, a quantum physicist at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia.
Now Tischler and her colleagues have carried out a version of the Wigner's friend test. By combining the classic thought experiment with another quantum head-scratcher called entanglement—a phenomenon that links particles across vast distances—they have also derived a new theorem, which they claim puts the strongest constraints yet on the fundamental nature of reality. Their study, which appeared in Nature Physics on August 17, has implications for the role that consciousness might play in quantum physics—and even whether quantum theory must be replaced.
Journal Reference:
Kok-Wei Bong, Aníbal Utreras-Alarcón, Farzad Ghafari, et al. A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox, Nature Physics (DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x)
(Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday August 20 2020, @11:40PM (1 child)
That's the thing about observations. They exist even if your models don't rely on them - or even predict that they shouldn't exist.
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday August 22 2020, @08:20PM
Every interpretation explains all observations, including those interpretations that have no wave function collapse. Therefore it is not true that we have observed a wave function collapse. What we've observed is phenomena which some, but not all, interpretations explain with a wave function collapse. Indeed, in some interpretations the wave function isn't even physical, which means that in those it is even conceptionally impossible to observe its collapse.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.