Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday September 18 2014, @06:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the sigint dept.

The Russian Embassy, White House, Supreme Court, and other landmarks have some nosy neighbors, claims the maker of an ultrasecure mobile phone.

Continuing a sort of cross-country tour to detect phony cell towers, also known as interceptors or IMSI catchers, researchers associated with the security firm ESD America have detected 15 of the covert devices in Washington D.C., plus three more in nearby Virginia.

The company used their ultrasecure CryptoPhone 500 to search for the interceptors, which can compromise phones through baseband hardware and are believed to have a range of roughly 1 mile. ESD America's phones allegedly detected telltale signs of call interception in the vicinity of the White House, the Russian Embassy, the Supreme Court, the Department of Commerce, and the Russell Senate Office Building, among other landmark buildings.

Les Goldsmith, ESD America's CEO ( http://esdamerica.com/ ), stresses that he can't be sure who runs these surveillance devices. But he points out that the U.S. government already has the ability to listen to or track calls through domestic networks, thanks to the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). “The U.S. government can listen to calls without deploying interceptors on the street,” says Goldsmith. “That’s why I think these are from foreign governments.”

http://www.popsci.com/article/gadgets/washington-dc-littered-phony-cell-towers

[Editor's note: see also our earlier story: Secure Android Phone Finds 'Fake' Cellphone Towers in U.S.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MrGuy on Thursday September 18 2014, @07:16PM

    by MrGuy (1007) on Thursday September 18 2014, @07:16PM (#95153)

    Which is great, until your random noise generator accidentally puts together a series of words that are seen as a threat, and you wind up in a small windowless room with some splainin' to do.

    Why not use PGP? Or, write your e-mail in a text editor and print to a PDF, rather than include text? What's the benefit to you of putting "noise" in someone's theoretical data set? This feels like a lot of effort for a fairly small "benefit" of stickin' it to the man...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by deimtee on Friday September 19 2014, @12:11AM

    by deimtee (3272) on Friday September 19 2014, @12:11AM (#95293) Journal

    If you're using a PDF don't forget to put in a background image and then rasterize the whole thing. No point making it easy for machines to read.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.