Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday September 30 2014, @06:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the industry-standards dept.

On monday morning at 9:00am, lawyers from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will ask a judge in a Kansas City federal courtroom to impose a preliminary injunction on Butterfly Labs (BFL), the embattled Bitcoin miner manufacturer. This would extend the temporary restraining order set down earlier this month, leaving the company controlled by a court-appointed receiver.

For the last 15 months, Ars has followed BFL as it has gone from being a curious hardware startup in a nascent industry to becoming the target of a federal investigation.

The FTC believes the three named members of the company’s board of directors—Jody Drake (aka Darla Drake), Nasser Ghoseiri, and Sonny Vleisides—spent millions of dollars of corporate revenue on non-corporate expenses like saunas and guns, while leaving many customer orders either wholly unfulfilled or significantly delayed.

In a slew of new court documents filed Saturday, FTC lawyers allege for the first time that not only did BFL engage in deceptive practices, it specifically used customer-ordered machines to mine its own bitcoins before shipping the machines out. (BFL has specifically denied mining for its own benefit.) The FTC also claims that BFL had its employees mine for personal gain using machines that had been refused by their purchasers or that had been returned after having arrived too late to be worthwhile.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GlennC on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:14PM

    by GlennC (3656) on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:14PM (#100086)

    I wonder how else they could perform system tests and verify functionality.

    If not, they'd likely be raked over the coals for making potentially non-functional devices.

    --
    Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by hemocyanin on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:24PM

    by hemocyanin (186) on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:24PM (#100092) Journal

    There is apparently a test suite: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Testnet [bitcoin.it]

    Testing would take 10-30 minutes testnet. BFL intentionally chose to mine because they would make no money with testnet. And they'd leave computers in testing until they had a replacement to take the already tested computer's position. At some point, BFL controlled something like 3% of worldwide mining capability. It's already been linked here, but this is a very interesting article on the topic: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/feds-butterfly-labs-mined-bitcoins-on-customers-boxes-before-shipping/ [arstechnica.com]

    • (Score: 2) by GlennC on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:32PM

      by GlennC (3656) on Tuesday September 30 2014, @07:32PM (#100097)

      Thanks for the information.

      This moves BFL from Incompetent to Malicious in my view.

      --
      Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.