Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Tuesday November 25 2014, @04:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the er-that-can't-be-right-can-it? dept.

For many decades, a fantasy among space enthusiasts has been to invent a device that produces a net thrust in one direction, without any need for reaction mass. Of course, a reaction-less space drive of this type is impossible. Or is it ? By Charles Platt

In October of this year, at the laboratory of Dr. James Woodward in California State University at Fullerton (above), I watched a very small-scale experiment that was surprisingly persuasive. Unlike all the "free energy" scams that you see online, Woodward's device does not violate basic physical laws (it does not produce more energy than it consumes, and does not violate Newton's third law). Nor is Woodward withholding any information about his methods. He has written a book, published by Springer, that explains in relentless detail exactly how his equipment works--assuming that it does, indeed, work. He published his theory in Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, 1990, and he even managed to get a US patent -- number 5,280,864, issued January 25, 1994.

http://boingboing.net/2014/11/24/the-quest-for-a-reactionless-s.html

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by EETech1 on Wednesday November 26 2014, @04:12AM

    by EETech1 (957) on Wednesday November 26 2014, @04:12AM (#120092)

    scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2009/04/10/the-left-hand-rule/

    How electrical current puts a torque in a cable
    hmmmm

  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Wednesday November 26 2014, @05:35PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Wednesday November 26 2014, @05:35PM (#120329)

    But it doesn't - it generates a magnetic field, which *would* potentially exert a force on the surrounding apparatus, except that there's a parallel cable running alongside it to complete the circuit, and that cable is generating an exactly equal-but-opposite magnetic field, canceling the effect out.