Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday December 02 2014, @03:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the applied-theosophy dept.

I found this a while back. It seems to show on one axis the Pull-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps ideology vs The Good Samaritan notion and the other axis looks to be the I-know-what's-best-for-you meme vs the It's-your-life,-live-it thing.
Maybe you too will find the relative positions of the various sects interesting.
The Buddhists and Atheists are close together.
The Muslims, Hindus, and black Baptists aren't far apart.
The Mormons and Southern Baptists are clustered.
The Catholics barely budge from dead center.

The Center for American Progress asks:

Does where you go to church (or temple, or mosque, or service, etc.) actually dictate your political views? A new chart, compiled by Tobin Grant of the Religion New Service [...] takes a stab at answering this question by visually illustrating the general political beliefs of religious people on two policy questions. In it, an individual's income bracket--and political opinions generally reflective of one's economic situation--looks to coincide with what "kind" of church he/she attends. Except for when it doesn't.

As Grant explains: "This new graph maps the ideologies of 44 different religious groups using data comes from [Pew Research's 2008] Religious Landscape Survey. This survey included 32,000 respondents. It asked very specific questions on religion that allow us to find out the precise denomination, church, or religion of each person."

In other words, the dimensions of each color-coded circle reflect the relative size of the religious group it represents, and a circle's position on the graph illustrates how the faithful feel about the government's involvement in both the economy (bigger government with more services vs. smaller government with less services) and morality (greater protection of morality vs. less protection of morality).

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday December 03 2014, @09:37PM

    by dry (223) on Wednesday December 03 2014, @09:37PM (#122407) Journal

    Different layer of government (provincial vs federal) and they seem to have cut education just to save money. Of course 30 years after they closed the technical schools and got rid of the apprentice programs they're crying because we have a shortage of plumbers and such and we'll have to import them from other countries along with the McDonalds workers we import (locals won't put up with much abuse for how little money they make).
    I realized after hitting submit that it was F-35, shitty expensive plane for us as it has no redundancy so when an engine goes out in the arctic, there goes a lot of money including the money invested in the pilot though on the other hand it is one less veteran making the government look bad for not supporting them at all after serving. It's interesting whether the population would rather get a small tax break or support the vets.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2