Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday December 30 2014, @12:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the reinvent-the-wheel dept.

Gene Marks, over at Forbes.com believes that Google is a great innovator, but keeps making the same mistake. He believes that both Google Glass and driverless cars are solutions looking for customers.

Google has brought us innovations — from search and maps to Gmail and collaboration services, that have literally changed our world. And great ideas keep coming from Google. Yet the company continues to make the same mistake. Over and over. I don’t mean the ones that result in product failures (and there have been quite a few over the years). I mean something a little more fundamental.

Take Google Glass. For those that haven’t seen it, it’s a pair of glasses that understands your verbal commands so that it can instantly perform tasks for you, like snapping a photo, taking a video, providing driving directions or searching a database. Glass is a great idea with great technology. It demonstrates the future power of the Internet of Things. There’s just one problem: no one is buying it.

The mistake [with driverless cars] is the same as with Glass: it’s a product without customers. It’s Google assuming that someday someone will actually buy a driverless car. Not a hobbyist or an eccentric millionaire. But a customer who actually needs or desires a driverless car. Someone who, given the choice of spending $30K on a car that they fully control and can go anywhere they want at any speed they want — or another, likely more expensive buggy that will only travel on certain routes at slower speeds and with less options. Hmm, which car would you buy?

However, despite the lack of immediate buyers, Marks believes that Google is well aware of the risks. It is the fact that it has huge financial resources which will allow it to continue until the markets change or are developed. Google is not looking at the next few years ahead, but rather at decades ahead when, it hopes, all the investment will prove to have been worthwhile.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Tuesday December 30 2014, @11:48PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Tuesday December 30 2014, @11:48PM (#130388) Journal

    The one thing I'm looking forward to is the optimization that intra-vehicle communication and driveless cars will allow for in combination - just imagine the flow of traffic you can achieve when all the cars instantly knows when the cars nearby break or speed up (and not having to wait for it to become visually appearant)... and then to be able to have the entire lane of cars to adjust their speeds when the first car slams its brakes.

    Now also imagine crossing (with cars) when being able to time it perfectly.. a lone car comming to cross a busy lane could have a gap created for it to slip through with minimal interruption in the flow of the other traffic (rather than having to stop entire crossing lanes)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2