SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the it-wasn't-supposed-to-be-this-way dept.
From a Wired article:
The unspoken reality is that the U.S. patent system creates a market so constricted by high transaction costs and legal risks that it excludes the vast majority of small and mid-sized businesses and prevents literally 95 percent of all patented discoveries from ever being put to use to create new products and services, new jobs, and new economic growth.
Even the most dramatic estimates of the social cost of abusive patent litigation range in the low tens of billions of dollars. But according to a new study by the distinguished economists Robert Litan of the Brookings Institution and Hal Singer of the Progressive Policy Institute—a study I [Jay Walker] helped to fund—liberating patent licensing from its litigation-focused costs and risks would enable tens of thousands of currently-dormant inventions to be commercialized and conservatively add up to $200 billion a year in increased output to the U.S. economy. That’s at least ten times bigger than the litigation problem, and directly impacts job creation.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Monday January 05 2015, @11:08PM
Such things like that could easily be tied to sales, or demand that a certain amount of product be manufactured and sold.
Again, it's an easy thing to fake. And who decides what this number is? That sounds like someone to bribe to me. Finally, it sounds to me like you're proposing a reward for the people who need the reward the least. What is the point of granting a patent to people who figured out how to successfully market a patented idea? The whole point is to reduce the risk for inventors who haven't yet succeeded.