Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday March 31 2015, @02:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the inching-our-way-along dept.

The American Academy of Pediatrics is recommending all liquid medicine for children be measured in milliliters instead of the traditional teaspoons and tablespoons.

"Metric dosing is the most precise way to dose medications and prevent overdoses," said Dr. Ian Paul, lead author of a new policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Accidental medication overdoses send more than 70,000 children to U.S. emergency rooms each year, according to background information with the statement, which is published online March 30 in the journal Pediatrics.

Using only milliliters "eliminates at least some significant sources of dosing confusion and errors," he added.

Currently, some over-the-counter medications include metric dosing instructions along with a measuring device marked in teaspoons, the academy noted.

Previous research has found that parents who use only milliliters when giving kids medicine make fewer errors than parents who use teaspoons or tablespoons, the statement said.

NASA uses metric units, although Lockheed Martin used pound force seconds instead of newton seconds in calculations with the Mars Climate Orbiter, causing it to burn up in the Martian atmosphere.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday March 31 2015, @07:50PM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Tuesday March 31 2015, @07:50PM (#165004) Homepage
    My experience is also that all medicines came with the appropriate spoon, but in those days (the 90s) that was always just 5ml. This only required the cognitive leap that one spoonful is one of the spoonfuls of that spoon. I'm not sure the double-ended one is anything but a sideways step - which mistake is more likely, confusing one end of the spoon for the other, or not being able to eyeball a half measure?
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2