The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has settled with Machinima Inc. after it paid YouTube broadcasters to endorse Microsoft's Xbox One without disclosure:
The FTC said the settlement [PDF] will forbid Machinima from running videos without properly disclosing when the broadcaster has been compensated for endorsing a product. "When people see a product touted online, they have a right to know whether they're looking at an authentic opinion or a paid marketing pitch," said FTC consumer protection bureau head Jessica Rich. "That's true whether the endorsement appears in a video or any other media."
[...] The videos were aired as part of an advertising campaign for Microsoft and its advertising agency, Starcom Mediavest Group. The FTC determined that neither Microsoft or Starcom would be subject to the complaint, which was instead made against Machinima. "The failures to disclose here appear to be isolated incidents that occurred in spite of, and not in the absence of, policies and procedures designed to prevent such lapses," the FTC said [PDF]. "Microsoft had a robust compliance program in place when the Xbox One campaign was launched, including specific legal and marketing guidelines concerning the FTC's Endorsement Guides."
Under the terms of the settlement, Machinima will be required for the next 30 years to clearly disclose when a video includes paid endorsements. The company will also be required to set up policies to ensure proper labeling and disclosure of paid endorsements and, for the next five years, maintain all documents related to the settlement available to the FTC.
Related: UK Vloggers "Must" Comply With Advertising Guidelines
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 04 2015, @06:54PM
why only 30 years and why only the company Machina inc?
shouldn't that be the law for all companies and forever?
(Score: 2) by MrGuy on Friday September 04 2015, @07:00PM
This.
This is like a plea bargain for breaking in entering including a promise that, for the next 5 years, I'll refrain from breaking and entering.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Nerdfest on Friday September 04 2015, @07:28PM
... into a particular building.
(Score: 2) by vux984 on Friday September 04 2015, @10:00PM
I haven't looked at the details, but I'd be willing to bet its a sort of 'probation' period; where the penalty today isn't severe, but if they get caught breaking the rules again in the next 30 years the penalties REALLY ramp up.