Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday October 20 2015, @04:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-just-for-windows-anymore dept.

Proving that the more complex the OS, the easier it is to hack, and how root really isn't required to attack a device a malicious app bypassed Ubuntu Phone security checks to give the attacker full control over the phone.

Luckily only 15 people are known to have downloaded the app but one has to wonder if Ubuntu Phone is already being targeted so successfully in its infancy what does that bode when its a more juicy target?

An educated guess for the unreleased sales statistics can be found on Riccardo Padovani's blog.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday October 20 2015, @09:26PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday October 20 2015, @09:26PM (#252476) Journal

    less complex != more secure
     
    True, perhaps. However, less complex is definitely easier to secure.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 20 2015, @11:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 20 2015, @11:35PM (#252520)

    As MICROS~1 has demonstrated repeatedly with its ridiculous time-to-patch performance, [google.com] the more complex the interactions of your code, the longer it takes to check that fixing 1 thing doesn't break 20 other things.

    In contrast, having code that does 1 thing, does it well, and interacts predictably with other code built to the same standard [wikipedia.org] makes life much easier when a patch is needed.

    -- gewg_