Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday October 23 2015, @07:22AM   Printer-friendly

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/10/youtube-red-offers-premium-youtube-for-9-99-a-month-12-99-for-ios-users/

Google describes YouTube Red as "the ultimate YouTube experience." The $9.99 subscription will cover all of YouTube products, meaning YouTube, YouTube Gaming, YouTube Kids, and the newly announced YouTube Music. The new service will let you watch YouTube videos without ads, save videos to watch offline on a mobile device, and play videos in the background on a mobile device.

There is a big catch about that $9.99 price: $9.99 will cover Android, desktop, and the mobile Web, but if you purchase a subscription via Apple's in-app purchasing on iOS, the price goes up to $12.99/month. Apple takes a 30 percent cut of all subscription revenue on its platform, and Google is passing that cost directly onto the consumer. (Most likely, customers will be able to bypass the higher price by paying $9.99 directly to Google and using the service across all platforms, including iOS, simply by signing into the app.)

YouTube won't talk about revenue sharing with content creators, but the company says it will pass on the "majority" of the revenue. In lieu of ad revenue, subscription revenue will be split up among creators by view time from Red subscribers. The subscription service changes things for YouTube creators, and anyone that doesn't agree to the new subscription terms will have their content set to "private" on YouTube.

darkfeline suggests the following specific points and topics for discussion:

1. iOS support costs extra, YouTube is passing the cost of Apple's cut directly to the consumer.
2. Up-to-date ad blockers and youtube-dl bypasses all YouTube ads to the best of my knowledge.
3. youtube-dl allows you to download videos for offline play.
4. How do you feel about exclusive paid content?
5. Who the heck is Pewdiepie and why does he make so much money? (How do you feel about YouTube "celebrities"?)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Hyperturtle on Friday October 23 2015, @06:02PM

    by Hyperturtle (2824) on Friday October 23 2015, @06:02PM (#253677)

    I used to do the same thing for the CDDB database.

    Then, the people that ran that closed it and started to charge for access to their content.

    I learned a lot from that, because I cataloged many many things and often was the very first to do so. I made more new entries than corrections.

    I for one am upset with a company that opts to sell and continually re-sell the results of my work that I had intended to have volunteered for the greater good. Being locked out and then expected to pay for access to the resources I provided was not part of that whole free work thing I expected to get rewarded with. karma yes. Paying to use the fruit of my efforts, when there was no reason to think I was going to pay for upkeep (such as a subscription here at Soylent)... no. They just locked people out and called it a crime to use the data without paying.

    There may be more exciting details to it, but I have to admit I simply avoided things like that going forward. I have found a few other free ones, but do I contribute to them? Not as much as I could. It only took one bad apple to ruin that barrel.

    What google is doing in this case is different, but there is no doubt that for this, and for many other things, they are being rewarded handsomely for being the self-appointed gatekeepers to numerous and varied types of content they have received mostly for free.

    Maybe they are in the business now of making quality stuff and wanting to make a buck off it, but only chumps broadcast on TV for free I guess. Google can now own (in select markets) :

    The content
    the server its on
    the distribution network to deliver it end to end
    the set top box to display it
    the router in the home to stream it
    the OS on the devices that use the streams
    and one ID to tie it all together

    How this relates to anything I am not sure, but it's part of the reason I don't want to pay for their content. It seems like they already have enough influence into the system already.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5