Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday October 23 2015, @04:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the first-Dirty-Jobs...-now-this! dept.

Sad news from Variety today, the next season of Mythbusters will be the last.

"'Mythbusters' is — and will always be — an incredibly important part of Discovery's history," said Rich Ross, group president of Discovery Channel, Animal Planet and Science Channel. "Adam and Jamie are enormous talents who have brought learning and science to the forefront of this network, and their legacy will continue to live on over at Science Channel. The 'Mythbusters' library will be moving over to Discovery's sister network in 2016, where I know audiences new and old alike will be able to experience and learn with Adam and Jamie and the rest of the 'Mythbusters' family."

I guess we'll just have to try it at home now.


Original Submission

[Ed: Headline updated, show was not "canceled".]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Friday October 23 2015, @05:45PM

    by Freeman (732) on Friday October 23 2015, @05:45PM (#253670) Journal

    Mythbusters is an interesting show. They had enough science to make it educational and enough explosion to keep you entertained. Seriously, who doesn't love a good explosion? Especially, if it's for Science! There were a number of oddities where they just outright ignored certain logical things, but I guess that's what you get from a TV show.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Joe Desertrat on Friday October 23 2015, @05:57PM

    by Joe Desertrat (2454) on Friday October 23 2015, @05:57PM (#253674)

    There were too many "now wait a minute" moments where they ignored factors in the results, but yeah, whatever replaces it, as Snow joked (probably won't seem funny when the replacement airs) is probably going to be a drop in quality.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 23 2015, @10:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 23 2015, @10:07PM (#253830)

    Mythbusters was also a military propaganda vehicle. Especially note their episode on not being able to get microwaves to do anything at all once the magnetrons were taken from the enclosures. Meanwhile, in LA County jail... [youtube.com] Hell, they could have just searched the US patent system or even just youtube for valid designs.... but "remote microwave gun == busted" according to Mythbusters.

    Fuck Mythbusters. Their "science" wasn't even such. They had reproducibility problems themselves when people called them on the carpet for their own "busted" myths. A sample size of one and below average ability to reproduce many of their own "findings" demonstrates the show was pure entertainment and propaganda.

    Pseudoscience should be ignored. The fact that their stars were "special effects" gurus instead of scientists should have tipped you off. It could have been a much better show, but that would have meant not lying to the public. I'm not glad the show is dead, but I'm glad they're gone.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by tathra on Saturday October 24 2015, @11:34AM

      by tathra (3367) on Saturday October 24 2015, @11:34AM (#253971)

      The fact that their stars were "special effects" gurus instead of scientists should have tipped you off.

      because only "scientists" can do science and think critically? no, as somebody else already said, them not being certified scientists is very much in their favor because it promotes the idea that anybody and everybody can think critically and do experiments to verify things for yourself. people are put off of science by Bill Nye the science guy because he's a geeky science nerd, non-scientists doing science is more likely to get the masses thinking and experimenting.

      • (Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Saturday October 24 2015, @05:44PM

        by Joe Desertrat (2454) on Saturday October 24 2015, @05:44PM (#254043)

        non-scientists doing science is more likely to get the masses thinking and experimenting.

        And not dismissing science as elitist.

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday October 24 2015, @02:51AM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 24 2015, @02:51AM (#253883)
    On Slashdot it's cool to hate MythBusters. Concidentally that started on the same day that casual viewers expressed affection for it.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈