SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
After 30 years in use, the US Army's official handgun, the Beretta M9 pistol, is being retired and AP reports that firearms manufacturers are competing for a rare chance to sell the US. Army a new handgun that would replace the current Cold War-era model. Critics say the M9 is too bulky for small-handed shooters, troops who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan complain it's not as hard-hitting as they would like, and it can't easily accommodate the accessories now common in the civilian firearms market, such as swappable gun-sights or gun-mounted lights. "It's a little one size-fits-most" says Rodney Briggs.. "It's been around for a really, really long time, and it's just old and outdated."
The US Army has a lengthy list of requirements. Among them, it wants a handgun with an adjustable grip that can easily fit large or small hands. That way, shooters don't have to adjust their grip mid-fight to operate hard-to-reach buttons or levers. The gun should accommodate sights that make it easier to shoot in low light. It should have a rail on which soldiers can easily attach additional equipment, like infrared pointers. The military also wants a gun that can be equipped with a suppressor, which muffles the sound of gunshots. Beretta intends to enter a new pistol called the APX into the competition. The new gun is a major engineering departure from the M9. It has a polymer frame like more recent handguns and can meet the Army's other requirements.
Beretta has publicly complained that the government never formally requested efforts to improve its M9, which the company said is a standard procedure for upgrading platforms. "If you look at the history... for a variety of weapons, you'll find all along we'll have used spiral development, product improvement. Where was the requirement they notify prime contractor with an opportunity to fix the problem?" says Howard Yellen, a military adviser for Beretta.
(Score: 5, Informative) by EQ on Saturday October 24 2015, @06:43AM
Here are the requirements -- note the first few are all about accuracy in combat, and the latter ones are about flexibility in function. Whats surprising is that last item, they arent specifying a caliber.
A lot of greybeards will say why not just use the old 1911, but it fails on a lot of these requirements, especially felt recoil and accommodating multiple mags and multiple grips and hand sizes.
What Ive read in the past few months is there there is the one pistol that does this best, a modernized 1911 striker-fired (as opposed to hammer fired) variant called the "STX" (not to be confused with a SIG 1911STX pistol) made by STI-Detonix. The company is is a team -up of 2 smaller companies called STI-Detonics. Detonics is a R&D company mainly doing creative work in design (and patenting it) based on human factors research in combat. STI mainly makes competition & special operations firearms (read: very high quality). They apparently would need to subcontract out some of the manufacturing because they are not big enough to make the expected numbers on their own. Their entry is actually pretty impressive in that it meets all the requirements and still manages to be a decent firearm by all reports. They're in there against the big names, but stand a chance to win if judge on technical and performance merits. This story [stltoday.com] from a few months back gives some of the details about the companies, and this story [bearingarms.com] gives an overview of the "STX" by way of interviewing one of its designers.
(Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Saturday October 24 2015, @12:45PM
'better', 'decent', 'meets specs', blah blah blah
sure, but does they company make the right 'campaign contributions' ? ? ?