Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday October 24 2015, @03:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-sunny-state-will-be-next dept.

The Center for American Progress reports

Solar power could soon be flourishing [in] the Sunshine State. [On October 22,] the Florida Supreme Court approved [PDF] an initiative for the 2016 ballot that would allow Floridians to vote to reduce the state's restrictions on rooftop solar power.

Although solar is growing exponentially nationwide, it has not thrived in Florida. Florida is one of a handful of states that prohibit residents from purchasing electricity from a source other than an electric utility. This has locked out third-party solar rooftop companies, such as SolarCity and SunRun, which install rooftop solar panels on a customer's property at no cost and sell solar-generated power to that customer at a reduced electric rate.

As ThinkProgress previously reported, a coalition of solar advocates called Floridians for Solar Choice has been leading the effort to change this policy by pursuing a ballot initiative to permit third-party financing for rooftop solar by private companies. To get the initiative on the ballot, Florida required the coalition to first collect 68,314 voter signatures and then have the initiative language approved by the state Supreme Court.

On [October 22], the ballot initiative cleared this major hurdle when the Florida Supreme Court approved the "Solar Choice Amendment" for the November 2016 ballot. Advocates now have to collect the requisite 683,149 signatures to ensure the initiative goes on the ballot. It will then have to pass with 60 percent of the vote in 2016.

[...] In 2008, the Florida [Public Service Commission--the state body responsible for regulating electricity--]released a report saying that rooftop solar alone had the potential to generate nearly 100 times [the current 530 MW derived from renewables in Florida]. [PDF]

Meanwhile, "public servant" Pam Bondi, Florida's Attorney General, continues to fight on multiple fronts to block renewables.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday October 24 2015, @11:44PM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday October 24 2015, @11:44PM (#254143) Journal

    So your are stating with certainty that those 14 lawyers HAVEN'T prosecuted any foreclosure cases?
    Or are you just posturing?

    Other agencies have found no fault [palmbeachpost.com] in the firing but plenty of fault with the two lawyers in question:the report that raised concerns about "disorganization," "non-responsiveness" to public records requests, "factual errors" in public presentations, "incorrect legal theories" and "sloppy" work.

    Yeah, I know, finding a citation will do no good, because you will promptly call it a white wash and a cover up. You've dug yourself in, and there is no proof on earth that you will accept.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2