Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Sunday October 25 2015, @11:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the photography-is-not-a-crime dept.

This year, murders have spiked in major cities across America and according to FBI director James B. Comey the additional scrutiny and criticism of police officers that has come in the wake of highly publicized incidents of police brutality may be the main reason for the recent increase in violent crime.

"I don't know whether that explains it entirely, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the explanation is a chill wind that has blown through American law enforcement over the last year," says Comey.

But Mr. Comey said that he had been told by many police leaders that officers who would normally stop to question suspicious people are opting to stay in their patrol cars for fear of having their encounters become worldwide video sensations. That hesitancy has led to missed opportunities to apprehend suspects, he said, and has decreased the police presence on the streets of the country's most violent cities.

The officers told Comey that youths surround them when they get out of their vehicles, taunting them and making videos of the spectacle with their cell phones.

"In today's YouTube world, there are officers reluctant to get out of their cars and do the work that controls violent crime," he said. "Our officers are answering 911 calls, but avoiding the informal contact that keeps bad guys from standing around, especially with guns."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by https on Sunday October 25 2015, @02:42PM

    by https (5248) on Sunday October 25 2015, @02:42PM (#254344) Journal

    It's been said before, but clearly it still requires repeating: a bad cop isn't going to beat the snot out of you unless certain of their partner's support - and their captain's. Your guess of 85%, well, you are kidding yourself.

    --
    Offended and laughing about it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Sunday October 25 2015, @03:23PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 25 2015, @03:23PM (#254358) Journal

    Possibly. And, it's possible that you overestimate the number of police beatings. I realize the media is on top of every case of police brutality, like flies on shit. But, it's possible that you don't realize that the media tends to inflate and exaggerate stuff like that.

    I've mentioned before that each and every incident needs to be weighed on it's own merits. I can point to two cases in Ohio, in which the cops are very obviously wrong. Outright murder of "black males with guns". Other cases are less clear cut. There are instances in which I support the cops involved, but the media has taken the opposite position. Michael Brown leads the list of those cases.

    If you are taking the word of the media in all cases, then you are being very seriously misled. From the media's perspective, every cop in the nation wakes up in the morning, thinking, "Oh God, I hope I get to kill a nigga today!" That view is at least as warped as the attitude in TFA, which can be summarized as "The Blacks are out to get us! We need better weapons, better surveillance, and we need to take the Negroe's phones from them!"

    As usual, reality lies somewhere in between extreme views.

    Most cops are good people. The bad thing about all those good people is, they are indoctrinated into a system that promotes a sense of brotherhood, that strongly resembles gang mentality.

    Yes, indoctrination works on good people, every bit as well as it works on bad people. The system is flawed.

    • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Sunday October 25 2015, @06:02PM

      by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Sunday October 25 2015, @06:02PM (#254384)

      Possibly. And, it's possible that you overestimate the number of police beatings.

      Why limit the discussion to beatings? Not every abuse of someone's rights leads to them being beaten or killed. For instance, there was stop-and-frisk, which was a violation of the fourth amendment. A number of cops use Stingrays; another violation of the fourth amendment. Many police also have a hand in enforcing drug laws, which violate the fundamental right to control your own body. Then we have DUI checkpoints, asset forfeiture, etc. Furthermore, if a 'good' cop defends or lies for a bad cop, then I would not deem them a good cop in the first place.

      When you take into account all of these abuses, including beatings and murders by cops, it is reasonable to conclude that most cops are bad. Since 'Just doing my job!' isn't a valid excuse, I can't forgive them for any of this.

      Yes, indoctrination works on good people, every bit as well as it works on bad people. The system is flawed.

      If you're too cowardly to stand up to injustices committed by your fellow cops, and so unprincipled as to be 'indoctrinated', then you cannot by any stretch of the imagination be called a "good cop" or a "good person".

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:21PM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:21PM (#254407) Journal

        I really believe that you don't understand "the system".

        Let's take stop and frisk. It's unconstitutional. That need not even be debated - the consitution guarantees your security in your person, your home, and your possessions. Your security has been impinged upon constantly and repeatedly ever since the advent of the automobile. The states have insisted that driving is a privilege, not a right, and they have made that privilege contingent upon some imaginary implied consent to a form of search. This has been an ongoing process for over a hundred years now. All of us have been conditioned and indoctrinated to believe that we surrender some of our right to privacy by operating a vehicle. We, the motoring public have been so conditioned, and they, law enforcement, has also been conditioned. And, mostly, "the system" works.

        It's unconstitutional, but it mostly works.

        You and I, as motorists, know full well that if we fail to yeild to a cop, we're going to get burned, either with a ticket, or possibly even being gunned down by that cop. We know it, the cops know it, and the courts support the fact - all despite the fact that the whole damned thing is unconstitutional. A significant portion of most jurisdiction's revenue streams rely upon the fact that we have all been so conditioned.

        Yes, YOU have been indoctrinated, and conditioned.

        Have you ever attempted to see all of this from a cop's point of view? I have. My sister felt a need to make life better for those around her. She really felt that she had the ability, and felt driven to do what she could do, by chasing after bad guys and putting them in prison. She applied for, was accepted, and was trained as a state police woman. And, she DID do some good. She caught some low life scum who enjoyed beating on their wives and children. She caught some common thieves. She caught some bigger thieves. She caught murderers. She caught rapists. I can't remember how many years she served in patrol cars, before she got promoted to driving desks instead. She was involved in so much crap, most people wouldn't believe it if I could recount it all.

        For all the good she did - she was also indoctrinated. It was necessary to work within the system, or not work at all. That's life. Sometimes, you've got to go along just to get along. I can't know ALL of the bullshit she had to put up with, but I can compare it to my experience in the military. Sometimes, it's best just not to notice something. You can't buck the system, and still do your job. To some extent, you take the good with the bad, and make the best of things.

        The system. It's one hell of a lot bigger than any individual, or any small group of individuals. If you buck the system, the entire system turns on you, and crushes you.

        Is it right? Well, not only "NO", but "FUCK NO!"

        There are times when right and wrong don't matter though.

        Keep in mind as you consider all of this: YOU HAVE BEEN INDOCTRINATED no less than cops who graduate from any cop academy.

        Key to changing how the cops interact with citizens, is making the cops understand that they have been indoctrinated, then altering the emphasis of their indoctrination. Just as important, is that we understand how we have also been indoctrinated.

        I've thrown a lot of stuff out in this post - I suppose I should offer at least one citation to support that whole indoctrination thing. How about that moronic "21 feet" rule. Let me find that . . .

        http://www.policemag.com/channel/weapons/articles/2014/09/revisiting-the-21-foot-rule.aspx [policemag.com]

        Please note that the article itself is an instructional, aimed at altering the indoctrination I mention.

        "During the past 30 years since the 21-Foot Rule has become informal doctrine within the law enforcement community, I have heard it misstated, misrepresented, and bastardized by use-of-force, firearms, and police practices experts from all sides. I actually reviewed an officer-involved shooting case where an officer with a carbine shot and killed a suspect armed with a knife from a distance of more than 150 feet and attempted to use the "Tueller Drill" as his defense."

        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:43PM

          by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:43PM (#254413)

          All of us have been conditioned and indoctrinated to believe that we surrender some of our right to privacy by operating a vehicle.

          Then their conditioning wasn't very effective, because I do not believe that nonsense. I do not believe that the government has a legitimate authority to force you to surrender your rights in exchange for being able to engage in some completely innocuous activity (such as driving or getting on an airplane). What they are doing now is just exerting force to keep their unjust policies in place.

          Yes, YOU have been indoctrinated, and conditioned.

          Indoctrinated into thinking or doing... what? If they're trying to indoctrinate and condition me, they should have picked better things to indoctrinate and condition me with. Because unlike most thug officers, I recognize that what is happening is bad and I actually try to stop it to the best of my ability.

          Have you ever attempted to see all of this from a cop's point of view? I have. My sister felt a need to make life better for those around her. She really felt that she had the ability, and felt driven to do what she could do, by chasing after bad guys and putting them in prison. She applied for, was accepted, and was trained as a state police woman. And, she DID do some good. She caught some low life scum who enjoyed beating on their wives and children. She caught some common thieves. She caught some bigger thieves. She caught murderers. She caught rapists. I can't remember how many years she served in patrol cars, before she got promoted to driving desks instead. She was involved in so much crap, most people wouldn't believe it if I could recount it all.

          For all the good she did - she was also indoctrinated. It was necessary to work within the system, or not work at all. That's life. Sometimes, you've got to go along just to get along. I can't know ALL of the bullshit she had to put up with, but I can compare it to my experience in the military. Sometimes, it's best just not to notice something. You can't buck the system, and still do your job. To some extent, you take the good with the bad, and make the best of things.

          Catching 'bad guys' isn't worth it if it means you're also using your position of authority to abuse people's rights, ignore the constitution, and/or defend those who do such things. If you're a cop who refuses to enforce unconstitutional laws, stands up to those who abuse people's rights, and just generally think for yourself, then I say you are a good person. Otherwise, you aren't. I don't care how "indoctrinated" you are; if you're violating the constitution and people's fundamental liberties, you are mere scum. Overcome your so-called "indoctrination" or get out.

          I think the same about all those working for the NSA who do not plan on pulling an Edward Snowden, and I also think the same about TSA thugs.

          Keep in mind as you consider all of this: YOU HAVE BEEN INDOCTRINATED no less than cops who graduate from any cop academy.

          I think you're incorrect, or you're using one of the definitions of "indoctrination" that I do not find very useful, as there are better terms when you mean something else. I guess "brainwashed" is more in line with what I'm thinking.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @03:31PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @03:31PM (#254711)

            Speaking as a US military veteran, I think you are giving yourself a bit too much credit. Seeing what the enemy, in this case criminals can do, makes it easy to dehumanize them. I doubt it is a conspiracy for the government to infringe on rights, but more likely misguided attempts to destroy the $bogeyman. I agree that this does not excuse violating the constitution or violence. I think it is most likely a culture and training issue.

            Whether you can resist indoctrination or not, a lot of people won't even realize they are being indoctrinated.

            • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Monday October 26 2015, @05:20PM

              by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Monday October 26 2015, @05:20PM (#254770)

              I doubt it is a conspiracy for the government to infringe on rights

              When did I say anything about a "conspiracy"? Never. It's a simple case of people abusing their powers; there is no mass conspiracy. This is precisely why they should have far less power and be more accountable when they abuse what powers they have.

              Whether you can resist indoctrination or not, a lot of people won't even realize they are being indoctrinated.

              I'm already getting tired of that word.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Hyperturtle on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:47PM

      by Hyperturtle (2824) on Sunday October 25 2015, @07:47PM (#254414)

      The saying is there are lies, damned lies, and statistics. He is using the statistics to repeat damned lies, and offers them as proof to speak new ones. People are paid big money to make the impossible sound plausible. He very likely didn't come up with these numbers himself. He has other things to do with his job. Being a talking head on TV repeating things is one of the drawbacks of his position, but those numbers are not likely ones he made up himself.

      So yes, that indoctrination works well on good people, and works very well on bad people too. The system is flawed and there is vested interest to blame those doing the exposing, as opposed to fixing the problems with the exposed. See, the statistics say right here... a famous poet said something along the lines of sunlight being the best disinfectant. In this instance, you can actually see the evil little creepy things shrivel when exposed to sunlight. This is an effort to get that magnifying glass focused on something else, I think... it's laughable for him to claim that with a straight face, but the fact it made news means someone is going to believe it.

      I don't remember if this guy commented about not having anything to hide, but it seems that whenever hidden things are found, it's an outrageous use of power they don't have and so it must be stopped.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday October 27 2015, @07:49AM

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Tuesday October 27 2015, @07:49AM (#255026) Journal

      Sure, the national media plays up a handful of cases. But on the local level, local TV stations and newspapers accept police PR, and wild inaccuracies in favor of the police narrative go unchallenged. It's no surprise since investigative journalism is weak or obscure on the local level, and the local media depend on access to the police for a lot of news.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]