Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Sunday October 25 2015, @11:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the hardly-surprising dept.

If you think it is okay to talk to your car infotainment system or smartphone while driving or even when stopped at a red light, think again. It takes up to 27 seconds to regain full attention after issuing voice commands, University of Utah researchers found in a pair of new studies for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

One of the studies showed that it is highly distracting to use hands-free voice commands to dial phone numbers, call contacts, change music and send texts with Microsoft Cortana, Apple Siri and Google Now smartphone personal assistants, though Google Now was a bit less distracting than the others.

The other study examined voice-dialing, voice-contact calling and music selection using in-vehicle information or "infotainment" systems in 10 model-year 2015 vehicles. Three were rated as moderately distracting, six as highly distracting and the system in the 2015 Mazda 6 as very highly distracting.

"Just because these systems are in the car doesn't mean it's a good idea to use them while you are driving," says University of Utah psychology professor David Strayer, senior author of the two new studies. "They are very distracting, very error prone and very frustrating to use. Far too many people are dying because of distraction on the roadway, and putting another source of distraction at the fingertips of drivers is not a good idea. It's better not to use them when you are driving."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @03:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @03:35PM (#254715)

    > No, dammit, it is about where your eyes are.

    Oh please. Could you for once get past literalism to understand the point?

    Of course your eyes matter, no fucking duh! Does that really need to be spelled out?

    But as this study showed having your eyes on the road is not sufficient. Kinda like being able to read words is not sufficient to understand the point.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @05:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @05:58PM (#254791)

    The study did not show that having your eyes on the road is not sufficient.
    There were no accidents during the study.
    QED.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @06:11PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @06:11PM (#254801)

      Wooosh!
      QED