Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday October 26 2015, @05:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the wise-voice dept.

Speaking at the Ruxcon information security conference in Melbourne on Sunday, Vixie, a pioneer of the Internet's DNS system, said that creating the new TLDs goes against ICANN's purpose:

"ICANN is a 501(c)(3) non-profit public charity [under the California Non-profit Public Benefit Corporation Law], and their job is to serve the public, not to serve the companies... I think that until they can come up with an actual public benefit reason they should be creating more of these, they've got no cause to act," Vixie said.

"There should be no price at which you can buy '.microsoft', but there is, and that's a mistake. That indicates corruption, as far as I'm concerned."

Vixie also indicated the WHOIS privacy industry wouldn't exist were it not for criminals:

"There are plenty of folks [who] would like to say [that] for civil society purposes we need the ability for dissidents to register a domain name and complain about their own government, and not have to worry about getting their doors kicked in. Frankly, that is not a realistic scenario, and that is not the way that WHOIS privacy gets used," he said.

Vixie encouraged conference attendees to implement technologies that improve the integrity of DNS (like DNSSEC) and called for replacement of the X.509 Certificate Authority system.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @08:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 26 2015, @08:23PM (#254859)

    I'm saying that Vixie is saying that WHOIS is not used for these purposes. You've presented no evidence that it is used for such purposes.

    It's publicly available personal information, of course it is used like that.

    .
    Even the UK Mail does not verify the address of every P.O. Box punter. Who are you trying to kid?
    You can tell them anything, and they won't care, they certainly won't check, they can't find their own ass with both hands.

    Ahh, I see you've had dealings with them ;P They will not provide a PO Box service without a validated id and address.

    Your Stalker is NOT going to show up at your post office and demand a physical address.

    If they are determined, they will.

    So screw the royal mail, and send it to your attorney, or Mail Boxes Etc.

    Feasible for a company, not for an individual.

    For anybody in the public eye, it's not a matter of if they end up being stalked and harassed, simply a matter of time before some determined crazy latches on to them.

  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday October 26 2015, @10:30PM

    by frojack (1554) on Monday October 26 2015, @10:30PM (#254907) Journal

    Feasible for a company, not for an individual.

    Last time I counted there were 12 to 13 companies doing private mailboxes in the UK, 3 or of them with nation wide coverage.
    And its quite cheap. My business partner is currently in Leeds in a temporary assignment. He's used this method in Italy and Australia as well. Its cheap.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:15AM (#254947)

      Work for a private mailbox provider do we? Why should I pay for an external subscription service when my domain registrar will offer it for a once-off nominal fee?