Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday October 27 2015, @10:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the they-are-hiding dept.

A couple of years ago it was reported that in 2012 more than half of all American wage earners made less than $30,000 per year. The Social Security Administration's new earnings report for 2014 is out and there's still much gnashing of teeth about the dying middle class. With earnings numbers that haven't changed much in 2 years, estimates running as high as 100 million working age Americans without a job, and no one tracking the population of H-1B visa holders, where are the jobs really?

The July 9, 2015, issue of The New York Review of Books carried a very thoughtful piece by Andrew Hacker. In "The Frenzy About High-Tech Talent," Hacker discusses a number of books and reports that address whether or not there really is a need for more tech talent, the justification for the H-1B visa program, and issues in the American educational system.

[...] Throughout his piece Hacker is basically questioning two things:

1. Is there really an unfilled need for STEM graduates, or are we actually graduating too many so that many end up unemployed or employed in different areas?

2. Are there flaws in the American education system, both at the K-12 level and in college, that lead us to be very dependent on foreign STEM graduates?

[...] The texts Hacker is reviewing, and his own information, seem to dwell predominately on overall job projections for the STEM fields. Nowhere does there appear a breakout of the job forecast for computing related job categories. With the increased ubiquity of computing across all industries and employment sectors, it seems unlikely that we will see the "deskilling" trend that may be occurring in engineering (whereby engineers create equipment that means they and others like them no longer have job opportunities). We know that there are many jobs in the "tech sector" but there are also a lot of computing jobs in banking, finance, manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, etc. We can get an accurate picture of future job openings only if we can make a good determination of the computing jobs that exist outside of the "tech sector."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:01PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:01PM (#255061) Journal

    Clearly the answer is for all of these STEM workers to concentrate on finding more efficiencies at the top, by rendering them redundant. We can invent robots that play golf, tell racy jokes, and repeat random sports scores and voila we will have replaced every CEO in America. Everything else is a very small shell script.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by AnonTechie on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:31PM

    by AnonTechie (2275) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @12:31PM (#255067) Journal
    --
    Albert Einstein - "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @01:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @01:56PM (#255086)

      Yee haa. A lot of bias in that article. The photos of missiles launching gives an impression of the author.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @08:42PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @08:42PM (#255273)

      The strongest weapon to shift geopolitical balances isn’t nukes or missiles, it’s technology

      Never realized nuclear arms and missiles were organic.

  • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Tuesday October 27 2015, @02:08PM

    by isostatic (365) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @02:08PM (#255095) Journal

    Clearly the answer is for all of these STEM workers to concentrate on finding more efficiencies at the top, by rendering them redundant. We can invent robots that play golf, tell racy jokes, and repeat random sports scores and voila we will have replaced every CEO in America. Everything else is a very small shell script.

    We could do that, but we'd spend too long arguing over writing the script in bash or perl or python or ruby or whatever.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 27 2015, @04:13PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 27 2015, @04:13PM (#255161) Journal
      I know! Let's write a script to decide that!
      • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Tuesday October 27 2015, @04:59PM

        by isostatic (365) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @04:59PM (#255177) Journal

        You mean something like

        #!/usr/bin/brainfuck
        ++++++++[>++++[>++>+++>+++>++>+>->>+[>.>---.+++++++..+++.>>.>+.>++.

      • (Score: 2) by DECbot on Tuesday October 27 2015, @06:45PM

        by DECbot (832) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @06:45PM (#255230) Journal

        switch((new Random()).nextInt(10) + 1)
        {
         case 1:
          return new Ceo(BASH);
         case 2:
          return new Ceo(PERL);
         case 3:
          return new Ceo(PYTHON);
         case 4:
          return new Ceo(RUBY);
         case 5:
          return new Ceo(PHP);
         case 7:
          return new Ceo(JAVASCRIPT);
         default:
          return new Ceo(BRAINFUCK);
        }

        Can I have my 30 rupee now?

        --
        cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
      • (Score: 2) by el_oscuro on Tuesday October 27 2015, @09:36PM

        by el_oscuro (1711) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @09:36PM (#255288)

        Obligatory:
        https://xkcd.com/927/ [xkcd.com]

        --
        SoylentNews is Bacon! [nueskes.com]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @05:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @05:43PM (#255205)

    But will the robots be best buddies with the board, other C-levels, and other boards? Because that's their real "qualifications", just like the feudal barons of old.