SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A couple of years ago it was reported that in 2012 more than half of all American wage earners made less than $30,000 per year. The Social Security Administration's new earnings report for 2014 is out and there's still much gnashing of teeth about the dying middle class. With earnings numbers that haven't changed much in 2 years, estimates running as high as 100 million working age Americans without a job, and no one tracking the population of H-1B visa holders, where are the jobs really?
The July 9, 2015, issue of The New York Review of Books carried a very thoughtful piece by Andrew Hacker. In "The Frenzy About High-Tech Talent," Hacker discusses a number of books and reports that address whether or not there really is a need for more tech talent, the justification for the H-1B visa program, and issues in the American educational system.
[...] Throughout his piece Hacker is basically questioning two things:
1. Is there really an unfilled need for STEM graduates, or are we actually graduating too many so that many end up unemployed or employed in different areas?
2. Are there flaws in the American education system, both at the K-12 level and in college, that lead us to be very dependent on foreign STEM graduates?
[...] The texts Hacker is reviewing, and his own information, seem to dwell predominately on overall job projections for the STEM fields. Nowhere does there appear a breakout of the job forecast for computing related job categories. With the increased ubiquity of computing across all industries and employment sectors, it seems unlikely that we will see the "deskilling" trend that may be occurring in engineering (whereby engineers create equipment that means they and others like them no longer have job opportunities). We know that there are many jobs in the "tech sector" but there are also a lot of computing jobs in banking, finance, manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, etc. We can get an accurate picture of future job openings only if we can make a good determination of the computing jobs that exist outside of the "tech sector."
(Score: 2) by DECbot on Tuesday October 27 2015, @04:25PM
why aren't medical Doctors required to keep their credentials current?
ABMS FAQ [boardcertifieddocs.com]
Many states (by law), hospitals (continued employment), practices (continued employment), and insurance agencies (continued or low cost malpractice insurance) require doctors to maintain board certification. However it is not a universal requirement. Re-certification often requires attendance to medical conferences, testing, and publishing research. Depending on the field of medicine being practiced, certification can be valid for 6 to 10 years. Just like keeping up with the C-standard language for a C programmer, it is in the doctor's interest to keep pace with medical developments and maintaining certification is the recognized way of demonstrating continued education.
Now, if programmers/sys admin would like to be recognized as a body of professionals without becoming a union shop, I would image being a board certified developer or system administrator would be one step in the right direction to ensure that they are keeping pace with new language standards, security practices, etc. But that would require a competent certification board as well as cooperation from the industry, MS, Apple, Cisco, and the Open Software movement, etcetera in addition to the PHB managers and HR office drones.
cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base