SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A couple of years ago it was reported that in 2012 more than half of all American wage earners made less than $30,000 per year. The Social Security Administration's new earnings report for 2014 is out and there's still much gnashing of teeth about the dying middle class. With earnings numbers that haven't changed much in 2 years, estimates running as high as 100 million working age Americans without a job, and no one tracking the population of H-1B visa holders, where are the jobs really?
The July 9, 2015, issue of The New York Review of Books carried a very thoughtful piece by Andrew Hacker. In "The Frenzy About High-Tech Talent," Hacker discusses a number of books and reports that address whether or not there really is a need for more tech talent, the justification for the H-1B visa program, and issues in the American educational system.
[...] Throughout his piece Hacker is basically questioning two things:
1. Is there really an unfilled need for STEM graduates, or are we actually graduating too many so that many end up unemployed or employed in different areas?
2. Are there flaws in the American education system, both at the K-12 level and in college, that lead us to be very dependent on foreign STEM graduates?
[...] The texts Hacker is reviewing, and his own information, seem to dwell predominately on overall job projections for the STEM fields. Nowhere does there appear a breakout of the job forecast for computing related job categories. With the increased ubiquity of computing across all industries and employment sectors, it seems unlikely that we will see the "deskilling" trend that may be occurring in engineering (whereby engineers create equipment that means they and others like them no longer have job opportunities). We know that there are many jobs in the "tech sector" but there are also a lot of computing jobs in banking, finance, manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, etc. We can get an accurate picture of future job openings only if we can make a good determination of the computing jobs that exist outside of the "tech sector."
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday October 27 2015, @05:14PM
"Denise, I'd like to give you a raise, but policy blah blah blah"
Actual policy, or, passing the buck?
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday October 27 2015, @05:50PM
Both, I suspect. Passing the buck has always been a favorite pastime among lower management, middle management, and sometimes even upper management. But, HR actually has pointless, petty policies. I listened to a an HR puke telling everyone at a meeting that there would be "no physical contact of any kind". Less than a minute later, the puke pounced on a husband and wife who were sitting to close to each other. Yes, the policies are there, waiting to be trotted out to punish people for nonsense.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Tuesday October 27 2015, @10:32PM
Actually, the policy book in many places is so complex, that the exact same performance behavior can be rewarded or punished.
Lots of companies subscribe to these policy manuals from commercial sources. They are often so generic and obtuse that even HR doesn't understand them, but that seminar they attended in Vegas highly recommended that manual.
Don't think for a minute that the policy is actually controlling. Policy merely provides the excuse for what the manager already decided to do anyway.
Its like Law. On any given day while going about your business, you could be arrested for SOMETHING, if only someone wanted that to happen. Charges may never be filed. but arrest records will never be purged.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday October 27 2015, @10:50PM
Good observation. Points, man.